Exploit the possiblities

Scientific Atlanta DPC2100 Cable Modem Cross Site Request Forgery

Scientific Atlanta DPC2100 Cable Modem Cross Site Request Forgery
Posted May 25, 2010
Authored by Dan Rosenberg

The Scientific Atlanta DPC2100 Cable Modem suffers from cross site request forgery and insufficient authentication vulnerabilities.

tags | exploit, vulnerability, csrf
advisories | CVE-2010-2025, CVE-2010-2026
MD5 | bc54b454b787a236cb2a8e47e43a8a32

Scientific Atlanta DPC2100 Cable Modem Cross Site Request Forgery

Change Mirror Download
Scientific Atlanta DPC2100 Cable Modem
Cross-Site Request Forgery and Insufficient Authentication
May 24, 2010
CVE-2010-2025, CVE-2010-2026


Scientific Atlanta, a Cisco company (www.cisco.com), produces the WebSTAR line
of cable modems, which are widely deployed by cable providers, especially for
home usage.  Certain versions of the firmware for the DPC2100 model feature a
web interface that is vulnerable to the following issues.  Testing was
performed on a DPC2100R2 modem, with firmware v2.0.2r1256-060303.  Other
WebSTAR modems and firmware versions may be vulnerable as well.

1. Cross-site request forgery (CSRF).  Several features provided by the web
interface fail to properly establish sessions that restrict access to
authorized users, including forms for changing the administrative password,
resetting the modem, and installing new firmware.  An attacker may create a
malicious website that, when visited by a victim, updates these settings on the
victim's modem on the victim's behalf without their authorization or need for
any additional user interaction.  This can be used to deny service by resetting
the modem or wiping the firmware, to change the default administrative
password, or potentially to steal information from the victim by installing
malicious firmware.  This issue has been assigned CVE-2010-2025.

2. Insufficient authentication. The modem's access control scheme, which has
levels numbered from 0-2 (or 0-3 on some other models), is not properly checked
before performing operations that should require authentication, including
resetting the modem and installing new firmware. The modem requires the proper
access level to access web interface pages containing forms that allow a user
to perform these actions, but does not properly authenticate the pages that
actually carry out these actions. By sending a POST request directly to these
pages, these actions may be performed without any authentication. Attacks may
be performed by an attacker on the local network or by leveraging the CSRF
vulnerability. This issue has been assigned CVE-2010-2026.

==Identifying Vulnerable Installations==

Most home installations of this modem will feature a web interface that is
accessible at "".  The following proof-of-concept code may
be used to test for vulnerability.  It leverages the CSRF vulnerability to
change the access level of your modem to the most restrictive settings (a
harmless action).  If your modem is vulnerable, then you will be presented with
a message stating that your settings have been successfully updated.  If you
are greeted with a page stating there was a "Password confirmation error", then
your modem password has been changed from the default but you are still
vulnerable.  If you are greeted with an HTTP authentication form or other
message, then your model is not vulnerable.

<title>Test for CSRF vulnerability in WebSTAR modems</title>


<form name="csrf" method="post" action="">
<input type="hidden" name="SAAccessLevel" value="0">
<input type="hidden" name="SAPassword" value="W2402">




In most cases, home users will be unable to update vulnerable firmware without
assistance from their cable providers.  If your firmware is vulnerable, contact
your cable provider and request a firmware update to the latest version.  For
the DPC2100R2 modems, the latest version string is

To prevent exploitation of CSRF vulnerabilities, users are always encouraged
to practice safe browsing habits and avoid visiting unknown or untrusted


These vulnerabilities were discovered by Dan Rosenberg

Thanks to Matthew Bergin for suggesting I should look at cable modems.


1/26/10 - Vulnerability reported to Cisco
1/26/10 - Response, issue assigned internal tracking number
2/26/10 - Status update requested
2/26/10 - Response
5/15/10 - Status update requested
5/17/10 - Response, confirmation that newest firmware resolves issues
5/17/10 - Disclosure date set
5/24/10 - Disclosure


CVE identifiers CVE-2010-2025 and CVE-2010-2026 have been assigned to these


RSS Feed Subscribe to this comment feed

No comments yet, be the first!

Login or Register to post a comment

Want To Donate?

Bitcoin: 18PFeCVLwpmaBuQqd5xAYZ8bZdvbyEWMmU

File Archive:

January 2018

  • Su
  • Mo
  • Tu
  • We
  • Th
  • Fr
  • Sa
  • 1
    Jan 1st
    2 Files
  • 2
    Jan 2nd
    13 Files
  • 3
    Jan 3rd
    16 Files
  • 4
    Jan 4th
    39 Files
  • 5
    Jan 5th
    26 Files
  • 6
    Jan 6th
    40 Files
  • 7
    Jan 7th
    2 Files
  • 8
    Jan 8th
    16 Files
  • 9
    Jan 9th
    25 Files
  • 10
    Jan 10th
    28 Files
  • 11
    Jan 11th
    44 Files
  • 12
    Jan 12th
    32 Files
  • 13
    Jan 13th
    2 Files
  • 14
    Jan 14th
    4 Files
  • 15
    Jan 15th
    31 Files
  • 16
    Jan 16th
    15 Files
  • 17
    Jan 17th
    16 Files
  • 18
    Jan 18th
    24 Files
  • 19
    Jan 19th
    15 Files
  • 20
    Jan 20th
    5 Files
  • 21
    Jan 21st
    0 Files
  • 22
    Jan 22nd
    0 Files
  • 23
    Jan 23rd
    0 Files
  • 24
    Jan 24th
    0 Files
  • 25
    Jan 25th
    0 Files
  • 26
    Jan 26th
    0 Files
  • 27
    Jan 27th
    0 Files
  • 28
    Jan 28th
    0 Files
  • 29
    Jan 29th
    0 Files
  • 30
    Jan 30th
    0 Files
  • 31
    Jan 31st
    0 Files

Top Authors In Last 30 Days

File Tags


packet storm

© 2018 Packet Storm. All rights reserved.

Security Services
Hosting By