exploit the possibilities
Home Files News &[SERVICES_TAB]About Contact Add New

Core Security Technologies Advisory 2009.0820

Core Security Technologies Advisory 2009.0820
Posted Sep 2, 2009
Authored by Core Security Technologies | Site coresecurity.com

Core Security Technologies Advisory - A vulnerability has been found in Dnsmasq that may allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code on servers or home routers running dnsmasq with the TFTP service enabled.

tags | exploit, arbitrary
advisories | CVE-2009-2957, CVE-2009-2958
SHA-256 | 80df67764b34800eb08eb9d5dc454a391b749b4892f98025471140ae22b92ce6

Core Security Technologies Advisory 2009.0820

Change Mirror Download

Hash: SHA1

Core Security Technologies - CoreLabs Advisory

Dnsmasq Heap Overflow and Null-pointer Dereference on TFTP Server

1. *Advisory Information*

Title: Dnsmasq Heap Overflow and Null-pointer Dereference on TFTP Server
Advisory ID: CORE-2009-0820
Advisory URL: http://www.coresecurity.com/content/dnsmasq-vulnerabilities
Date published: 2009-08-31
Date of last update: 2009-08-31
Vendors contacted: Simon Kelley
Release mode: Coordinated release

2. *Vulnerability Information*

Class: Buffer overflow
Remotely Exploitable: Yes
Locally Exploitable: No
Bugtraq ID: 36120, 36121
CVE Name: CVE-2009-2957, CVE-2009-2958

3. *Vulnerability Description*

Dnsmasq is a lightweight DNS forwarder and DHCP server. A
vulnerability has been found that may allow an attacker to execute
arbitrary code on servers or home routers running dnsmasq[1] with the
TFTP service[2][3] enabled ('--enable-tfp'). This service is not
enabled by default on most distributions; in particular it is not
enabled by default on OpenWRT or DD-WRT. Chances of successful
exploitation increase when a long directory prefix is used for TFTP.
Code will be executed with the privileges of the user running dnsmasq,
which is normally a non-privileged one.

Additionally there is a potential DoS attack to the TFTP service by
exploiting a null-pointer dereference vulnerability.

4. *Vulnerable packages*

. dnsmasq 2.40.
. dnsmasq 2.41.
. dnsmasq 2.42.
. dnsmasq 2.43.
. dnsmasq 2.44.
. dnsmasq 2.45.
. dnsmasq 2.46.
. dnsmasq 2.47.
. dnsmasq 2.48.
. dnsmasq 2.49.
. Older versions are probably affected too, but they were not checked.

5. *Non-vulnerable packages*

. dnsmasq 2.50

6. *Vendor Information, Solutions and Workarounds*

If the TFTP service is enabled and patching is not available
immediately, a valid workaround is to filter TFTP for untrusted hosts
in the network (such as the Internet). This is the default
configuration when enabling TFTP on most home routers.

Patches are already available from the software author. Most
distributions should release updates for binary packages soon.

7. *Credits*

The heap-overflow vulnerability (CVE-2009-2957) was discovered during
Bugweek 2009 by Pablo Jorge and Alberto Solino from the team "Los
Herederos de Don Pablo" of Core Security Technologies.

The null-pointer dereference (CVE-2009-2958) was reported to the
author of dnsmasq independently by an uncredited code auditor. It was
merged with this advisory for user's convenience.

8. *Technical Description*

8.1. *Heap Overflow vulnerability (CVE-2009-2957, BID 36121)*

First let's focus on the overflow vulnerability. The 'tftp_request'
calls 'strncat' on 'daemon->namebuff', which has a predefined size of
'MAXDNAME' bytes (defaulting to 1025).


else if (filename[0] == '/')
daemon->namebuff[0] = 0;
strncat(daemon->namebuff, filename, MAXDNAME);

- -----------/

This may cause a heap overflow because 'daemon->namebuff' may already
contain data, namely the configured 'daemon->tftp_prefix' passed to
the daemon via a configuration file.


if (daemon->tftp_prefix)
if (daemon->tftp_prefix[0] == '/')
daemon->namebuff[0] = 0;
strncat(daemon->namebuff, daemon->tftp_prefix, MAXDNAME)

- -----------/

The default prefix is '/var/tftpd', but if a longer prefix is used,
arbitrary code execution may be possible.

Sending the string resulting from the execution of the following
python snippet to a vulnerable server, with a long enough directory
prefix configured, should crash the daemon.


import sys
sys.stdout.write( '\x00\x01' + "A"*1535 + '\x00' + "netascii" + '\x00' )

- -----------/

8.2. *Null-pointer Dereference vulnerability (CVE-2009-2958, BID 36120)*

Now onto the null-pointer dereference. The user can crash the service
by handcrafting a packet, because of a problem on the guard of the
first if inside this code loop:


while ((opt = next(&p, end)))
if (strcasecmp(opt, "blksize") == 0 &&
(opt = next(&p, end)) &&
!(daemon->options & OPT_TFTP_NOBLOCK))
transfer->blocksize = atoi(opt);
if (transfer->blocksize < 1)
transfer->blocksize = 1;
if (transfer->blocksize > (unsigned)daemon->packet_buff_sz - 4)
transfer->blocksize = (unsigned)daemon->packet_buff_sz - 4;
transfer->opt_blocksize = 1;
transfer->block = 0;

if (strcasecmp(opt, "tsize") == 0 && next(&p, end) &&
transfer->opt_transize = 1;
transfer->block = 0;

- -----------/

The problem exists because the guard of the first if includes the
result of 'opt = next(&p, end)' as part of the check. If this returns
'NULL', the guard will fail and in the next if 'strcasecmp(opt,
"tsize")' will derrefence the null-pointer.

9. *Report Timeline*

. 2009-08-20:
Core Security Technologies notifies Simon Kelley of the vulnerability,
including technical details of the vulnerability in an advisory draft.

. 2009-08-21:
Simon Kelley acknowledges the vulnerability and confirms to be working
on a patch. He also informs that he is aware that most home router
distributions have tftp turned off by default, and firewalled, and
suggests this should be mentioned on the advisory. Simon also mentions
that a NULL-pointer dereference bug has also been discovered on that
code, and suggests merging both bugs in the same advisory. Monday
31/08 is accepted as a possible release date for this advisory, and
help is offered in contacting package maintainers of dnsmasq for most
operating systems.

. 2009-08-21:
Core changes the advisory draft to accommodate Simon's suggestions.
About the NULL-pointer dereference, Core mentions the terms it thinks
appropriate for the bug to be merged into this advisory, and details
how this would affect the following procedures, such as asking for a
CVE/Bugtraq ID.

. 2009-08-23:
Simon Kelley contacts Core back, saying that the terms for the
null-pointer derrefence bug to be included in the advisory are ok. He
also mentions that the finder of this bug prefers to remain uncredited
in this advisory. Details are sent by him about the new bug so that
the advisory draft can be updated to include it.

. 2009-08-23:
Core asks for proper CVE and Bugtraq ID numbers, specifying it
believes each vulnerability reported in this advisory should be
assigned its own.

. 2009-08-23:
Vincent Danen, from Red Hat's Security Response Team contacts Core in
order to discuss both vulnerabilities by a secure communications
channel, and offers its help in obtaining proper CVE numbers,
specifying they also believe a separate number should be assigned to
each vulnerability.

. 2009-08-23:
Core replies to Vincent Danen by sending its gpg key. Core also
mentions separate CVE numbers have already been asked.

. 2009-08-23:
Core replies to Simon Kelley, including a new advisory draft with both
bugs merged.

. 2009-08-23:
Core receives proper CVE and Bugtraq ID numbers for both bugs, and
sends them to Red Hat and Simon Kelley.

. 2009-08-31:
The advisory CORE-2009-0820 is published.

10. *References*

[1] http://www.thekelleys.org.uk/dnsmasq/doc.html
[2] http://www.isi.edu/in-notes/ien/ien133.txt
[3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trivial_File_Transfer_Protocol

11. *About CoreLabs*

CoreLabs, the research center of Core Security Technologies, is
charged with anticipating the future needs and requirements for
information security technologies. We conduct our research in several
important areas of computer security including system vulnerabilities,
cyber attack planning and simulation, source code auditing, and
cryptography. Our results include problem formalization,
identification of vulnerabilities, novel solutions and prototypes for
new technologies. CoreLabs regularly publishes security advisories,
technical papers, project information and shared software tools for
public use at: http://www.coresecurity.com/corelabs.

12. *About Core Security Technologies*

Core Security Technologies develops strategic solutions that help
security-conscious organizations worldwide develop and maintain a
proactive process for securing their networks. The company's flagship
product, CORE IMPACT, is the most comprehensive product for performing
enterprise security assurance testing. CORE IMPACT evaluates network,
endpoint and end-user vulnerabilities and identifies what resources
are exposed. It enables organizations to determine if current security
investments are detecting and preventing attacks. Core Security
Technologies augments its leading technology solution with world-class
security consulting services, including penetration testing and
software security auditing. Based in Boston, MA and Buenos Aires,
Argentina, Core Security Technologies can be reached at 617-399-6980
or on the Web at http://www.coresecurity.com.

13. *Disclaimer*

The contents of this advisory are copyright (c) 2009 Core Security
Technologies and (c) 2009 CoreLabs, and may be distributed freely
provided that no fee is charged for this distribution and proper
credit is given.

14. *PGP/GPG Keys*

This advisory has been signed with the GPG key of Core Security
Technologies advisories team, which is available for download at


Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (MingW32)

Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/





Login or Register to add favorites

File Archive:

February 2024

  • Su
  • Mo
  • Tu
  • We
  • Th
  • Fr
  • Sa
  • 1
    Feb 1st
    16 Files
  • 2
    Feb 2nd
    19 Files
  • 3
    Feb 3rd
    0 Files
  • 4
    Feb 4th
    0 Files
  • 5
    Feb 5th
    24 Files
  • 6
    Feb 6th
    2 Files
  • 7
    Feb 7th
    10 Files
  • 8
    Feb 8th
    25 Files
  • 9
    Feb 9th
    37 Files
  • 10
    Feb 10th
    0 Files
  • 11
    Feb 11th
    0 Files
  • 12
    Feb 12th
    17 Files
  • 13
    Feb 13th
    20 Files
  • 14
    Feb 14th
    25 Files
  • 15
    Feb 15th
    15 Files
  • 16
    Feb 16th
    6 Files
  • 17
    Feb 17th
    0 Files
  • 18
    Feb 18th
    0 Files
  • 19
    Feb 19th
    35 Files
  • 20
    Feb 20th
    25 Files
  • 21
    Feb 21st
    18 Files
  • 22
    Feb 22nd
    15 Files
  • 23
    Feb 23rd
    0 Files
  • 24
    Feb 24th
    10 Files
  • 25
    Feb 25th
    0 Files
  • 26
    Feb 26th
    0 Files
  • 27
    Feb 27th
    0 Files
  • 28
    Feb 28th
    0 Files
  • 29
    Feb 29th
    0 Files

Top Authors In Last 30 Days

File Tags


packet storm

© 2022 Packet Storm. All rights reserved.

Security Services
Hosting By