exploit the possibilities
Home Files News &[SERVICES_TAB]About Contact Add New

Cisco IKE Implementation Group Name Enumeration

Cisco IKE Implementation Group Name Enumeration
Posted Apr 19, 2013
Authored by Jonathan Claudius | Site trustwave.com

Cisco ASA versions 8.4(2), 8.4(5), and 9.1(1) suffer from a group name enumeration vulnerability in their IKE implementation.

tags | exploit
systems | cisco
advisories | CVE-2013-1194
SHA-256 | 7a3a1b289b63638a076af1a5703754d8bf858f40ec5baec07c9f385998b4caad

Cisco IKE Implementation Group Name Enumeration

Change Mirror Download
Trustwave SpiderLabs Security Advisory TWSL2013-004:
Group Name Enumeration Vulnerability in Cisco IKE Implementation


Published: 04/18/13
Version: 1.0

Vendor: Cisco (www.cisco.com)
Product: ASA (Adaptive Security Appliance)
Versions affected: 8.4(2), 8.4(5), 9.1(1)

Product description:
The Cisco ASA 5505 Adaptive Security Appliance is a next-generation,
full-featured security appliance for small business, branch office, and
enterprise teleworker environments. The Cisco ASA 5505 delivers
high-performance firewall, SSL and IPsec VPN, and rich networking services
in a modular, "plug-and-play" appliance.

Finding 1: Group Name Enumeration
**** Credit: Daniel Turner of Trustwave SpiderLabs
CVE: CVE-2013-1194
CWE: CWE-206

Each VPN configuration is assigned a group name, which is used to manage
separate Security Associations. Previous advisories have found that when a
VPN endpoint is configured to allow Aggressive Mode IKE negotiations using
PSK, a hash of the PSK can be captured and potentially cracked offline. In
order to successfully crack this hash a correct group name is required.

The above product versions are susceptible to a group name enumeration
vulnerability, because of a difference in the way the device responds to
correct and incorrect group names sent in the initial exchange packet.

Similar to CSCeg00323 and CSCtj96108 where this was possible because of no
response and a response with a DPD payload respectively. It has been found
that it remains possible to distinguish a correct group name by the number
of response packets sent by the device. A correct group name elicits three
attempts to continue the handshake and an additional encrypted phase 2
packet, while the device will only respond twice to an incorrect group.
Enumeration is slow because of the requirement to wait for the responding
packets, but this has been successfully accomplished. Below are examples of
the different responses:

Example 1:

#Request using invalid group name

ike-scan -M -A --id=incorrectgroup

#Response using invalid group name

13:22:59.929273 IP > isakmp: phase 1 I agg
13:22:59.932624 IP > isakmp: phase 1 R agg
13:23:05.696571 IP > isakmp: phase 1 R agg

Example 2:

#Request using valid group name

ike-scan -M -A --id=correctgroup

#Response using valid group name

13:23:05.693673 IP > isakmp: phase 1 I agg
13:23:13.690392 IP > isakmp: phase 1 R agg
13:23:21.690464 IP > isakmp: phase 1 R agg
13:23:29.690528 IP > isakmp: phase 1 R agg
13:23:37.691275 IP > isakmp: phase 2/others R inf[E]

This information can be used to capture and crack a weak PSK if Aggressive
Mode is enabled.

Remediation Steps:
The vendor will be releasing security fixes to the above issues and affected
versions can be patched by installing the 8.4(6) firmware or the 9.1(2)
firmware for the Cisco ASA platform. Administrators with other affected
firmware versions should be aware that this information could be
potentially be revealed and it is recommended that factory default group or
easily guessable group names are not used.

Additional Credits:
Jonathan Claudius of Trustwave SpiderLabs: Confirmation of
Vulnerability/Behavior on Cisco ASA 8.4(5) and 9.1(1)

Revision History:
02/21/13 - Vulnerability disclosed
03/14/13 - Vendor acknowledges security issue
04/17/13 - Vendor releases security alert
04/18/13 - Advisory published

1. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sn-20050624-vpn-grpname.shtml
2. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/csr/cisco-sr-20101124-vpn-grpname.html
3. http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityNotice/CVE-2013-1194

About Trustwave:
Trustwave is the leading provider of on-demand and subscription-based
information security and payment card industry compliance management
solutions to businesses and government entities throughout the world. For
organizations faced with today's challenging data security and compliance
environment, Trustwave provides a unique approach with comprehensive
solutions that include its flagship TrustKeeper compliance management
software and other proprietary security solutions. Trustwave has helped
thousands of organizations--ranging from Fortune 500 businesses and large
financial institutions to small and medium-sized retailers--manage
compliance and secure their network infrastructure, data communications and
critical information assets. Trustwave is headquartered in Chicago with
offices throughout North America, South America, Europe, Africa, China and
Australia. For more information, visit https://www.trustwave.com

About Trustwave SpiderLabs:
SpiderLabs(R) is the advanced security team at Trustwave focused on
application security, incident response, penetration testing, physical
security and security research. The team has performed over a thousand
incident investigations, thousands of penetration tests and hundreds of
application security tests globally. In addition, the SpiderLabs Research
team provides intelligence through bleeding-edge research and proof of
concept tool development to enhance Trustwave's products and services.

The information provided in this advisory is provided "as is" without
warranty of any kind. Trustwave disclaims all warranties, either express or
implied, including the warranties of merchantability and fitness for a
particular purpose. In no event shall Trustwave or its suppliers be liable
for any damages whatsoever including direct, indirect, incidental,
consequential, loss of business profits or special damages, even if
Trustwave or its suppliers have been advised of the possibility of such
damages. Some states do not allow the exclusion or limitation of liability
for consequential or incidental damages so the foregoing limitation may not


This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein (including any reliance thereon) is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you received this transmission in error, please immediately contact the sender and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format.

Login or Register to add favorites

File Archive:

September 2023

  • Su
  • Mo
  • Tu
  • We
  • Th
  • Fr
  • Sa
  • 1
    Sep 1st
    2 Files
  • 2
    Sep 2nd
    21 Files
  • 3
    Sep 3rd
    0 Files
  • 4
    Sep 4th
    17 Files
  • 5
    Sep 5th
    34 Files
  • 6
    Sep 6th
    29 Files
  • 7
    Sep 7th
    11 Files
  • 8
    Sep 8th
    25 Files
  • 9
    Sep 9th
    0 Files
  • 10
    Sep 10th
    0 Files
  • 11
    Sep 11th
    26 Files
  • 12
    Sep 12th
    23 Files
  • 13
    Sep 13th
    17 Files
  • 14
    Sep 14th
    22 Files
  • 15
    Sep 15th
    16 Files
  • 16
    Sep 16th
    0 Files
  • 17
    Sep 17th
    0 Files
  • 18
    Sep 18th
    19 Files
  • 19
    Sep 19th
    60 Files
  • 20
    Sep 20th
    23 Files
  • 21
    Sep 21st
    15 Files
  • 22
    Sep 22nd
    8 Files
  • 23
    Sep 23rd
    0 Files
  • 24
    Sep 24th
    0 Files
  • 25
    Sep 25th
    17 Files
  • 26
    Sep 26th
    0 Files
  • 27
    Sep 27th
    0 Files
  • 28
    Sep 28th
    0 Files
  • 29
    Sep 29th
    0 Files
  • 30
    Sep 30th
    0 Files

Top Authors In Last 30 Days

File Tags


packet storm

© 2022 Packet Storm. All rights reserved.

Security Services
Hosting By