what you don't know can hurt you
Home Files News &[SERVICES_TAB]About Contact Add New

Apple assembleBGScanResults Heap Overflow

Apple assembleBGScanResults Heap Overflow
Posted Sep 22, 2017
Authored by Google Security Research, laginimaineb

There is a heap overflow vulnerability in Apple's assembleBGScanResults when handling ioctl results.

tags | advisory, overflow
systems | apple
advisories | CVE-2017-7105
SHA-256 | e497d754530da645d0dfa81b8d9378547e7195bb0e4f5b900f516e4799502c81

Apple assembleBGScanResults Heap Overflow

Change Mirror Download
Apple: Heap overflow in "assembleBGScanResults" when handling ioctl results 

CVE-2017-7105


Broadcom produces Wi-Fi HardMAC SoCs which are used to handle the PHY and MAC layer processing. These chips are present in both mobile devices and Wi-Fi routers, and are capable of handling many Wi-Fi related events without delegating to the host OS. On iOS, the "AppleBCMWLANBusInterfacePCIe" driver is used in order to handle the PCIe interface and low-level communication protocols with the Wi-Fi SoC (also referred to as "dongle"). Similarly, the "AppleBCMWLANCore" driver handles the high-level protocols and the Wi-Fi configuration.

Along with the regular flow of frames transferred between the host and the dongle, the two communicate with one another via a set of "ioctls" which can be issued to read or write dongle configuration from the host. This information is exchanged using the "Control Completion" ring, rather than the regular "RX" ring.

The "AppleBCMWLANCore" driver performs periodic scans for nearby networks. To do so, the "retrieveBGScanCachedInfo" function issues the WLC_GET_VAR ioctl (262) to read the "pfnbest_bssid" IO-var. Then, after the scan results are collected into a heap-allocated buffer, they are processed by the "assembleBGScanResults" function.

The returned PFN results buffer has the following structure:

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Version | Status | Count (n) | PFN #1 | ... | PFN #n |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 4 8 12 24 12+(n-1)*12 12+n*12

However, it is important to note that an attacker controlling the dongle can fully control the result of arbitrary ioctl calls. As a result, all ioctl command results should be considered untrusted. For example, on the BCM4355C0 SoC with firmware version 9.44.78.27.0.1.56 (used on the iPhone 7 build 14C92), the "iovar" handling function is located at ROM address 0x4678C, and can be hooked by overwriting its registration pointer at RAM address 0x2068F4.

Assuming an attacker has control over the Wi-Fi dongle, the returned PFN buffer can be arbitrarily crafted. Taking a look at the "assembleBGScanResults" function, we can see that it has the following approximate high-level logic:

int64_t assembleBGScanResults(..., char* results) {
...

uint32_t status = *(uint32_t*)(results + 4);
uint32_t count_pfns = *(uint32_t*)(results + 8);

if (!count_pfns)
return 1;

if (status == 0) {
...

char* copied_pfn_results = IOMalloc((count_pfns * 20) & 0xFFFC);
char* pfn = results + 12;
char local_pfn[20];

for (uint32_t i=0; i < count_pfns; i++, pfn += 12, copied_pfn_results += 20) {

memmove(local_pfn, pfn, 6);
*((int32_t*)(local_pfn + 12) = (int32_t)(pfn[6]);
*((int32_t*)(local_pfn + 16) = (int32_t)(pfn[7]);
memmove(local_pfn + 8, pfn + 10, 2);

memmove(copied_pfn_results, local_pfn, 20);

}
...
}
...
}

(where "results" is the buffer returned by the dongle when reading the IO-Var).

As we can see above, the value "(count_pfns * 20) & 0xFFFC" is used as the length of the allocated buffer, but no check is performed to make sure that this calculation does not result in a truncation of the multiplication. As a result, an attacker can choose the value of the "Count" field so that (count_pfns * 20) & 0xFFFC < count_pfns * 20 (for example, by setting count_pfns to 0x10001). This will cause the copy loop above to copy the contents of the returned IO-Var OOB into the heap allocated buffer, resulting in a heap overflow.

This bug is subject to a 90 day disclosure deadline. After 90 days elapse
or a patch has been made broadly available, the bug report will become
visible to the public.




Found by: laginimaineb

Login or Register to add favorites

File Archive:

September 2024

  • Su
  • Mo
  • Tu
  • We
  • Th
  • Fr
  • Sa
  • 1
    Sep 1st
    261 Files
  • 2
    Sep 2nd
    17 Files
  • 3
    Sep 3rd
    38 Files
  • 4
    Sep 4th
    52 Files
  • 5
    Sep 5th
    23 Files
  • 6
    Sep 6th
    27 Files
  • 7
    Sep 7th
    0 Files
  • 8
    Sep 8th
    1 Files
  • 9
    Sep 9th
    16 Files
  • 10
    Sep 10th
    38 Files
  • 11
    Sep 11th
    21 Files
  • 12
    Sep 12th
    40 Files
  • 13
    Sep 13th
    18 Files
  • 14
    Sep 14th
    0 Files
  • 15
    Sep 15th
    0 Files
  • 16
    Sep 16th
    21 Files
  • 17
    Sep 17th
    51 Files
  • 18
    Sep 18th
    19 Files
  • 19
    Sep 19th
    0 Files
  • 20
    Sep 20th
    0 Files
  • 21
    Sep 21st
    0 Files
  • 22
    Sep 22nd
    0 Files
  • 23
    Sep 23rd
    0 Files
  • 24
    Sep 24th
    0 Files
  • 25
    Sep 25th
    0 Files
  • 26
    Sep 26th
    0 Files
  • 27
    Sep 27th
    0 Files
  • 28
    Sep 28th
    0 Files
  • 29
    Sep 29th
    0 Files
  • 30
    Sep 30th
    0 Files

Top Authors In Last 30 Days

File Tags

Systems

packet storm

© 2024 Packet Storm. All rights reserved.

Services
Security Services
Hosting By
Rokasec
close