what you don't know can hurt you
Home Files News &[SERVICES_TAB]About Contact Add New

Apache CXF Failed Element Verification

Apache CXF Failed Element Verification
Posted Jun 8, 2012
Authored by Colm O hEigeartaigh | Site cxf.apache.org

Apache CXF does not verify that elements were signed or encrypted by a particular Supporting Token. This affects all released versions as of 06/08/2012.

tags | advisory
advisories | CVE-2012-2379
SHA-256 | c9c7fa7be43cf530477727dcae683b3b6071776b83dccb3e1ab0dc315ec3a472

Apache CXF Failed Element Verification

Change Mirror Download
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


CVE-2012-2379: Apache CXF does not verify that elements were signed or
encrypted by a particular Supporting Token.

Severity: Important

Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation

Versions Affected:

This vulnerability affects all released versions of Apache CXF.

Description:

Apache CXF currently validates WS-SecurityPolicy SignedParts,
SignedElements,
EncryptedParts and EncryptedElements policies by checking to see if the
matching elements are signed or encrypted if they are included in the
request.
However, CXF does not ensure that the elements were signed or encrypted by
a particular token, if these policies are specified as children of a
Supporting Token. For example, the following policy requires that (the
private
key associated with) an X.509 Token sign the WS-Addressing "To" header. CXF
currently checks to see whether the header was signed, but not by a X.509
Token in particular:

<sp:SupportingToken>
<sp:X509Token sp:IncludeToken="...">...</sp:X509Token>
<sp:SignedParts>
<sp:Header Name="To" Namespace="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing"
/>
</sp:SignedParts>
</sp:SupportingToken>

Note that this applies for both WS-SecurityPolicy 1.1 and 1.2 policies.

This has been fixed in revision:

http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1338219&view=rev

All released versions of CXF are affected.

Migration:

Users of CXF prior to 2.4.x should upgrade to either 2.4.8, 2.5.4, or 2.6.1.
CXF 2.4.5 to 2.4.7 users should upgrade to 2.4.8 as soon as possible.
CXF 2.5.1 to 2.5.3 users should upgrade to 2.5.4 as soon as possible.
CXF 2.6.0 users should upgrade to 2.6.1 as soon as possible.

References: http://cxf.apache.org/security-advisories.html

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJP0HTcAAoJEGe/gLEK1TmDFVwH/Agv7RZZh8osal/xBWENZYKE
LrLK51XzYuASo6B6ezU69HsVmgLpbopl94Rhn7mbKdz0dFG417WbqftXz81PFc0N
UYIh8zNf/SAgm+7onRq9kawFqp28cbP2B1hkhT16q0BEMcB4bJ06YLR8J7VHcyxu
QW//mMuOszVvz1Pn6jlcaQryQ8tvwWPT1Li/L5QmZxmw/M4N9joOEtIp/3kJ+HhX
vW5BW9/9x4BSRU50dF13/viStUqUh5bZDDz1R6qbYm8IDU4F2eC8lc5KcGfBvbM7
uUmVTtsKsdlRo8d2gUL0iyCKp7n+2w9D19Y+gcUvsqKZGwQE/LuryDVNK4EFeBc=
=hkRS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--
Colm O hEigeartaigh

Talend Community Coder
http://coders.talend.com
Login or Register to add favorites

File Archive:

September 2024

  • Su
  • Mo
  • Tu
  • We
  • Th
  • Fr
  • Sa
  • 1
    Sep 1st
    261 Files
  • 2
    Sep 2nd
    17 Files
  • 3
    Sep 3rd
    38 Files
  • 4
    Sep 4th
    52 Files
  • 5
    Sep 5th
    23 Files
  • 6
    Sep 6th
    27 Files
  • 7
    Sep 7th
    0 Files
  • 8
    Sep 8th
    1 Files
  • 9
    Sep 9th
    16 Files
  • 10
    Sep 10th
    0 Files
  • 11
    Sep 11th
    0 Files
  • 12
    Sep 12th
    0 Files
  • 13
    Sep 13th
    0 Files
  • 14
    Sep 14th
    0 Files
  • 15
    Sep 15th
    0 Files
  • 16
    Sep 16th
    0 Files
  • 17
    Sep 17th
    0 Files
  • 18
    Sep 18th
    0 Files
  • 19
    Sep 19th
    0 Files
  • 20
    Sep 20th
    0 Files
  • 21
    Sep 21st
    0 Files
  • 22
    Sep 22nd
    0 Files
  • 23
    Sep 23rd
    0 Files
  • 24
    Sep 24th
    0 Files
  • 25
    Sep 25th
    0 Files
  • 26
    Sep 26th
    0 Files
  • 27
    Sep 27th
    0 Files
  • 28
    Sep 28th
    0 Files
  • 29
    Sep 29th
    0 Files
  • 30
    Sep 30th
    0 Files

Top Authors In Last 30 Days

File Tags

Systems

packet storm

© 2024 Packet Storm. All rights reserved.

Services
Security Services
Hosting By
Rokasec
close