exploit the possibilities
Home Files News &[SERVICES_TAB]About Contact Add New

cisco-3000.txt

cisco-3000.txt
Posted Jul 12, 2002
Authored by Master Phi

The Cisco VPN3000 gateway lets remote client dictate which maximum MTU to use when sending back ESP frames, regardless of the transmitting capabilities of the physical medium. This can lead to denial of service conditions.

tags | remote, denial of service
systems | cisco
SHA-256 | c02c5efceb3de66f0063f72ec5186d0b3d0fd4ffbf6f7b6b4cc5f61471cc7661

cisco-3000.txt

Change Mirror Download

('binary' encoding is not supported, stored as-is) Cisco VPN3000 gateway MTU overflow
==================================

Bug class: Conceptual/bad protocol implementation
Equipments affected: Cisco/VPN 3000 Concentrator with
software vpn3000-3.5.Rel-k9.bin

FACTS
The Cisco VPN3000 gateway lets remote client dictate
which maximum MTU to use when sending back ESP
frames, regardless of the transmitting capabilities
of the physical medium.

IMPACT
* Oversized frames get silently discarded by
equipements linked to the gateway's public
interface and retransmissions occur.
* Other disturbances or DoS against neighboring
equipements may occur, especially as many IP
stacks on routers and sniffers etc ... are
poorly implemented.

DETAILS
We have witnessed this phenomena after establishing
tunnels with the "VPN dialer" over a modem
connexion: when the target sends back ethernet
frames with size close to the max ethernet MTU
(1500), the gateway encrypts the frames adding
ESP headers and stupidly tries to send a
1580-bytes frame back to the client.

RESOLUTION
-> From the official documentation there is no way
to enforce a maximum MTU on the VPN gateway.
-> Hence: a gateway software patch by Cisco is
necessary: if MTU negociation occurs, the gateway
should set a max-MTU threshold (the physical medium's !).

PSEUDO WORKAROUNDS

* client side: For Windows-based OS (likely Unix and
Linux-based OS too), Cisco released a tool
called setMTU.exe that can prevent ill MTU
negociation from happening.

* target side: artificially lowering the max MTU
on the interfaces.

-> But such a policy is not acceptable:
The VPN client, as well as remote targets,
should not have to be aware of
the gateway's interface configuration !

The bug does not lie in client software, but
in the gateway's software.

Master Phi

---
Today's statement:
Networking software robustness isn't worth the tenth
of that of arcade game engines.
Let's call it junk software.
Login or Register to add favorites

File Archive:

August 2024

  • Su
  • Mo
  • Tu
  • We
  • Th
  • Fr
  • Sa
  • 1
    Aug 1st
    15 Files
  • 2
    Aug 2nd
    22 Files
  • 3
    Aug 3rd
    0 Files
  • 4
    Aug 4th
    0 Files
  • 5
    Aug 5th
    15 Files
  • 6
    Aug 6th
    11 Files
  • 7
    Aug 7th
    43 Files
  • 8
    Aug 8th
    42 Files
  • 9
    Aug 9th
    36 Files
  • 10
    Aug 10th
    0 Files
  • 11
    Aug 11th
    0 Files
  • 12
    Aug 12th
    27 Files
  • 13
    Aug 13th
    0 Files
  • 14
    Aug 14th
    0 Files
  • 15
    Aug 15th
    0 Files
  • 16
    Aug 16th
    0 Files
  • 17
    Aug 17th
    0 Files
  • 18
    Aug 18th
    0 Files
  • 19
    Aug 19th
    0 Files
  • 20
    Aug 20th
    0 Files
  • 21
    Aug 21st
    0 Files
  • 22
    Aug 22nd
    0 Files
  • 23
    Aug 23rd
    0 Files
  • 24
    Aug 24th
    0 Files
  • 25
    Aug 25th
    0 Files
  • 26
    Aug 26th
    0 Files
  • 27
    Aug 27th
    0 Files
  • 28
    Aug 28th
    0 Files
  • 29
    Aug 29th
    0 Files
  • 30
    Aug 30th
    0 Files
  • 31
    Aug 31st
    0 Files

Top Authors In Last 30 Days

File Tags

Systems

packet storm

© 2022 Packet Storm. All rights reserved.

Services
Security Services
Hosting By
Rokasec
close