exploit the possibilities
Home Files News &[SERVICES_TAB]About Contact Add New

Chakra CFG Bypass Due To Bug In ServerFreeAllocation

Chakra CFG Bypass Due To Bug In ServerFreeAllocation
Posted Dec 5, 2017
Authored by Ivan Fratric, Google Security Research

Charka suffers from a CFG bypass due to a bug in ServerFreeAllocation.

tags | advisory
advisories | CVE-2017-11874
SHA-256 | 3d19e7cbedb472d2428edd6222fbd45a4c7b0fc67382167d792c513a4d2719d5

Chakra CFG Bypass Due To Bug In ServerFreeAllocation

Change Mirror Download
Chakra: CFG bypass due to a bug in ServerFreeAllocation 

CVE-2017-11874


Chakra JIT server exposes a ServerFreeAllocation() method that can be used to free an existing JIT allocation (for example when the corresponding function gets freed).

The simplified function's implementation is:

context->SetValidCallTargetForCFG((PVOID)codeAddress, false);
context->GetCodeGenAllocators()->emitBufferManager.FreeAllocation((void*)codeAddress);

First, the implementation makes sure that the CFG flag for the codeAddress is set to 0 and then frees the allocation at this address.

The problem is that FreeAllocation is too permissive. Below is the simplified code of FreeAllocation():

while(allocation != nullptr)
{
if (address >= allocation->allocation->address && address < (allocation->allocation->address + allocation->bytesUsed))
{
...
this->allocationHeap.Free(allocation->allocation);
return true;
}
previous = allocation;
allocation = allocation->nextAllocation;
}

This means that the allocation will get freed not only if codeAddress points to the beginning of the allocation but also if codeAddress points *anywhere inside* the allocation.

So, if an attacker is able to change the codeAddress being used as an argument to ServerFreeAllocation() (e.g. with a read/write primitive inside a Content Process) and they increase codeAddress (but still let it point inside the same allocation), the allocation will get freed, but the CFG flag for the function will not be cleared correctly (the CFG flag will be cleared for the wrong address).

Later, if executable memory is allocated over the same (freed) space, the CFG target will still be valid, even if the new allocation will not be alligned perfectly with the old allocation.


This bug is subject to a 90 day disclosure deadline. After 90 days elapse
or a patch has been made broadly available, the bug report will become
visible to the public.




Found by: ifratric

Login or Register to add favorites

File Archive:

May 2024

  • Su
  • Mo
  • Tu
  • We
  • Th
  • Fr
  • Sa
  • 1
    May 1st
    44 Files
  • 2
    May 2nd
    5 Files
  • 3
    May 3rd
    11 Files
  • 4
    May 4th
    0 Files
  • 5
    May 5th
    0 Files
  • 6
    May 6th
    28 Files
  • 7
    May 7th
    3 Files
  • 8
    May 8th
    4 Files
  • 9
    May 9th
    54 Files
  • 10
    May 10th
    12 Files
  • 11
    May 11th
    0 Files
  • 12
    May 12th
    0 Files
  • 13
    May 13th
    17 Files
  • 14
    May 14th
    11 Files
  • 15
    May 15th
    17 Files
  • 16
    May 16th
    13 Files
  • 17
    May 17th
    22 Files
  • 18
    May 18th
    0 Files
  • 19
    May 19th
    0 Files
  • 20
    May 20th
    17 Files
  • 21
    May 21st
    0 Files
  • 22
    May 22nd
    0 Files
  • 23
    May 23rd
    0 Files
  • 24
    May 24th
    0 Files
  • 25
    May 25th
    0 Files
  • 26
    May 26th
    0 Files
  • 27
    May 27th
    0 Files
  • 28
    May 28th
    0 Files
  • 29
    May 29th
    0 Files
  • 30
    May 30th
    0 Files
  • 31
    May 31st
    0 Files

Top Authors In Last 30 Days

File Tags

Systems

packet storm

© 2022 Packet Storm. All rights reserved.

Services
Security Services
Hosting By
Rokasec
close