Skip to main contentSkip to navigationSkip to navigation
Wikipedia
An investigation by parent body Wikimedia found the Saudi government had penetrated Wikipedia’s senior ranks in the region, two rights groups said. Photograph: Lionel Bonaventure/AFP/Getty Images
An investigation by parent body Wikimedia found the Saudi government had penetrated Wikipedia’s senior ranks in the region, two rights groups said. Photograph: Lionel Bonaventure/AFP/Getty Images

Saudi Arabia jails two Wikipedia staff in ‘bid to control content’

This article is more than 1 year old

Administrators jailed for 32 years, and eight years, as activists warn of ploy to infiltrate website

Saudi Arabia has infiltrated Wikipedia and jailed two administrators in a bid to control content on the website, weeks after a former Twitter worker was jailed in the US for spying for the Saudis.

One administrator was jailed for 32 years, and another was sentenced to eight years, the activists said.

An investigation by parent body Wikimedia found the Saudi government had penetrated Wikipedia’s senior ranks in the region, with Saudi citizens acting or forced to act as agents, two rights groups said.

“Wikimedia’s investigation revealed that the Saudi government had infiltrated the highest ranks in Wikipedia’s team in the region,” Democracy for the Arab World Now (Dawn) and Beirut-based Smex said in a joint statement.

Dawn, which is based in Washington DC and was founded by slain Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi, and Smex, which promotes digital rights in the Arab world, cited “whistleblowers and trusted sources” for the information.

There was no immediate comment from the Saudi government or from Wikimedia, which puts free educational content online through initiatives like Wikipedia, the online encyclopedia, and Wiktionary.

Dawn and Smex’s statement comes after Wikimedia last month announced global bans for 16 users “who were engaging in conflict of interest editing on Wikipedia projects in the Mena [Middle East and North Africa] region”.

In an investigation that started last January, Wikimedia said it “was able to confirm that a number of users with close connections with external parties were editing the platform in a coordinated fashion to advance the aim of those parties”.

Wikimedia was referring to Saudis acting under the influence of the Saudi government, Dawn and Smex said, citing their sources.

Two high-ranking “admins” – volunteer administrators with privileged access to Wikipedia, including the ability to edit fully protected pages – have been imprisoned since they were arrested on the same day in September 2020, the two bodies added.

The arrests appeared to be part of a “crackdown on Wikipedia admins in the country”, Dawn and Smex said, naming the two people imprisoned as Osama Khalid and Ziyad al-Sofiani.

Abdullah Alaoudh, Dawn’s director of research for the Gulf, said Khalid was jailed for 32 years and Sofiani received an eight-year sentence.

“The arrests of Osama Khalid and Ziyad al-Sofiani on one hand, and the infiltration of Wikipedia on the other hand, show a horrifying aspect of how the Saudi government wants to control the narrative and Wikipedia,” Alaoudh told AFP.

Last month, former Twitter worker Ahmad Abouammo was sentenced to three-and-a-half years in prison by a San Francisco court for crimes including being an illegal agent of a foreign government.

Prosecutors accused Abouammo and fellow Twitter employee Ali Alzabarah, who is wanted by the FBI, of being enlisted by Saudi officials between late 2014 and early 2015 to get private information on accounts that were critical of the Saudi regime.

More on this story

More on this story

  • If costs force Google to charge for AI, competitors will cheer

  • Google fined €250m in France for breaching intellectual property deal

  • Joe Biden has just dealt a big defeat to big tech

  • Apple reportedly faces €500m fine from EU over music streaming access

  • Google stops notifying publishers of ‘right to be forgotten’ removals from search results

  • The TikTok mouth-taping trend may not be as beneficial as you’re told

  • Social media firms ‘not ready to tackle misinformation’ during global elections

  • EU unveils ‘revolutionary’ laws to curb big tech firms’ power

  • How the EU Digital Services Act affects Facebook, Google and others

Most viewed

Most viewed