U.S. representatives mount attack on spam

From...

by Margret Johnston

(IDG) -- A bill designed to give consumers and ISPs greater control over a flood of unwanted e-mail, commonly known as spam, was introduced Wednesday by the same U.S. representatives who sponsored the legislation in the last Congress.

Representative Heather Wilson, R-N.M., and Representative Gene Green, D-Texas, resubmitted the Unsolicited Commercial E-Mail Act. The bill introduced Wednesday is identical to the bill that passed the House in the last Congress by a vote of 427 to one. It has been assigned to the House Energy and Commerce Committee, a spokesman for Wilson said.

IDG.net INFOCENTER InfoWorld Main Page InfoWorld Test Center Subscribe to InfoWorld Newsletters Infoworld Opinions and Spotlights Top 10 rules for e-business success Bluetooth wireless connectivity set to take off DSL in distress Visit an IDG site Choose a site: IDG.net CIO Computerworld Darwin Dummies.com GamePro.com The Industry Standard ITWorld.com InfoWorld.com JavaWorld LinuxWorld Macworld Online Network World Fusion PC World Publish.com SunWorld IDG.net search

The bill stalled in the Senate last year after being introduced late in the session, but "we are optimistic that we will have success this year," the spokesman said. The Senate is expected to schedule a hearing of the bill, he added.

The bill is aimed at giving consumers the power to block unwanted e-mail and providing ISPs who bear the cost of delivering spam with a legal right of action to block those who dump unwanted messages onto their networks, according to a statement issued by Wilson's office. The bill already has more than 60 co-sponsors, the statement said.

The bill would require accurate return addresses on unsolicited commercial e-mail, make it illegal to continue sending junk e-mail to someone who has asked to be removed from a distribution list, require unsolicited commercial e-mail to be labeled, and require ISPs to let their customers opt out of receiving junk e-mail if the ISP profits from allowing it into their system.

The bill would also set a penalty for continuing to send junk e-mail after someone has asked for it to stop and allow ISPs to sue spammers for $500 per message if they violate their anti-spam policy.

AOL sues porn company over alleged spam
January 8, 2001
Analysis: The spam overload of 2000
January 4, 2001
EarthLink antispam measure trips some users
October 30, 2000
Test your e-mail etiquette
September 28, 2000
E-mail marketers announce anti-spam standards
September 26, 2000
Managing the e-mail explosion
September 6, 2000
Brightmail releases anti-virus, anti-spam software
August 10, 2000

House passes spam bill
(IDG.net)
First Amendment is obstacle to spam legislation
(The Industry Standard)
E-mail marketers form antispam alliance
(Computerworld)
E-mail marketing serves up spam
(The Industry Standard)
Marketing's beef with spam labels
(Computerworld)
Spam: What's in a name?
(InfoWorld.com)
Unsolicited e-mail marketing: Are you in or out?
(InfoWorld.com)
The spam-tastic year 2000
(PCWorld.com)

Cyber Entertainment Network
Mail Abuse Prevention System LLC

Note: Pages will open in a new browser window

External sites are not endorsed by CNN Interactive.