exploit the possibilities
Showing 1 - 1 of 1 RSS Feed

CVE-2016-10142

Status Candidate

Overview

An issue was discovered in the IPv6 protocol specification, related to ICMP Packet Too Big (PTB) messages. (The scope of this CVE is all affected IPv6 implementations from all vendors.) The security implications of IP fragmentation have been discussed at length in [RFC6274] and [RFC7739]. An attacker can leverage the generation of IPv6 atomic fragments to trigger the use of fragmentation in an arbitrary IPv6 flow (in scenarios in which actual fragmentation of packets is not needed) and can subsequently perform any type of fragmentation-based attack against legacy IPv6 nodes that do not implement [RFC6946]. That is, employing fragmentation where not actually needed allows for fragmentation-based attack vectors to be employed, unnecessarily. We note that, unfortunately, even nodes that already implement [RFC6946] can be subject to DoS attacks as a result of the generation of IPv6 atomic fragments. Let us assume that Host A is communicating with Host B and that, as a result of the widespread dropping of IPv6 packets that contain extension headers (including fragmentation) [RFC7872], some intermediate node filters fragments between Host B and Host A. If an attacker sends a forged ICMPv6 PTB error message to Host B, reporting an MTU smaller than 1280, this will trigger the generation of IPv6 atomic fragments from that moment on (as required by [RFC2460]). When Host B starts sending IPv6 atomic fragments (in response to the received ICMPv6 PTB error message), these packets will be dropped, since we previously noted that IPv6 packets with extension headers were being dropped between Host B and Host A. Thus, this situation will result in a DoS scenario. Another possible scenario is that in which two BGP peers are employing IPv6 transport and they implement Access Control Lists (ACLs) to drop IPv6 fragments (to avoid control-plane attacks). If the aforementioned BGP peers drop IPv6 fragments but still honor received ICMPv6 PTB error messages, an attacker could easily attack the corresponding peering session by simply sending an ICMPv6 PTB message with a reported MTU smaller than 1280 bytes. Once the attack packet has been sent, the aforementioned routers will themselves be the ones dropping their own traffic.

Related Files

Red Hat Security Advisory 2017-0817-01
Posted Mar 21, 2017
Authored by Red Hat | Site access.redhat.com

Red Hat Security Advisory 2017-0817-01 - The kernel packages contain the Linux kernel, the core of any Linux operating system. Security Fix: It was discovered that a remote attacker could leverage the generation of IPv6 atomic fragments to trigger the use of fragmentation in an arbitrary IPv6 flow and could subsequently perform any type of a fragmentation-based attack against legacy IPv6 nodes that do not implement RFC6946.

tags | advisory, remote, arbitrary, kernel
systems | linux, redhat
advisories | CVE-2016-10088, CVE-2016-10142, CVE-2016-2069, CVE-2016-2384, CVE-2016-6480, CVE-2016-7042, CVE-2016-7097, CVE-2016-8399, CVE-2016-9576
MD5 | b3b4f6f881b29620a89e2c49c244298d
Page 1 of 1
Back1Next

File Archive:

September 2020

  • Su
  • Mo
  • Tu
  • We
  • Th
  • Fr
  • Sa
  • 1
    Sep 1st
    20 Files
  • 2
    Sep 2nd
    15 Files
  • 3
    Sep 3rd
    15 Files
  • 4
    Sep 4th
    4 Files
  • 5
    Sep 5th
    1 Files
  • 6
    Sep 6th
    1 Files
  • 7
    Sep 7th
    15 Files
  • 8
    Sep 8th
    27 Files
  • 9
    Sep 9th
    7 Files
  • 10
    Sep 10th
    16 Files
  • 11
    Sep 11th
    9 Files
  • 12
    Sep 12th
    0 Files
  • 13
    Sep 13th
    0 Files
  • 14
    Sep 14th
    25 Files
  • 15
    Sep 15th
    15 Files
  • 16
    Sep 16th
    15 Files
  • 17
    Sep 17th
    15 Files
  • 18
    Sep 18th
    12 Files
  • 19
    Sep 19th
    1 Files
  • 20
    Sep 20th
    1 Files
  • 21
    Sep 21st
    15 Files
  • 22
    Sep 22nd
    21 Files
  • 23
    Sep 23rd
    8 Files
  • 24
    Sep 24th
    15 Files
  • 25
    Sep 25th
    0 Files
  • 26
    Sep 26th
    0 Files
  • 27
    Sep 27th
    0 Files
  • 28
    Sep 28th
    0 Files
  • 29
    Sep 29th
    0 Files
  • 30
    Sep 30th
    0 Files

Top Authors In Last 30 Days

File Tags

Systems

packet storm

© 2020 Packet Storm. All rights reserved.

Services
Security Services
Hosting By
Rokasec
close