Twenty Year Anniversary

Blogger_HTTP_response_splitting.txt

Blogger_HTTP_response_splitting.txt
Posted Jan 25, 2006
Authored by Meder Kydyraliev | Site o0o.nu

Blogger's personal page redirection mechanism contains a classic HTTP response splitting vulnerability in the "Location" HTTP header. The problem occurs due to use of unsanitized user-supplied data in the "Location" HTTP header, which enables attacker to inject CRLF(%0d%0a) characters thus splitting server's response taking full control over the contents of second HTTP response. Exploitation of the vulnerability can lead to cross-site scripting (XSS), cache poisoning and phishing attacks.

tags | advisory, web, xss
MD5 | 6d0529a5d76e9b40136f39019976a540

Blogger_HTTP_response_splitting.txt

Change Mirror Download

Blogger.com classic HTTP response splitting vulnerability
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

0. Original Advisory
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://o0o.nu/~meder/o0o_Blogger_HTTP_response_splitting.txt


I. Background
~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Blogger.com is Google's blogging service.


II. Description
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Blogger's personal page redirection mechanism contains a classic HTTP
response splitting vulnerability in the "Location" HTTP header. The
problem occurs due to use of unsanitized user-supplied data in the
"Location" HTTP header, which enables attacker to inject CRLF(%0d%0a)
characters thus splitting server's response taking full control over
the contents of second HTTP response. Exploitation of the vulnerability
can lead to cross-site scripting (XSS), cache poisioning and phishing
attacks.

The following URL was taking contents of query string and using it in
"Location" HTTP header without proper sanitation:

http://www.blogger.com/r?[URL here]


III. Vendor status
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Vulnerability has been fixed on 13/01/2006


IV. Disclosure timeline
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

02/01/2006 - Issue discovered. Vendor notified.
02/01/2006 - Initial vendor response.
12/01/2006 - Vendor inquired on status.
13/01/2006 - Vendor response and confirmation that bug fixed.


V. References
~~~~~~~~~~~~~

1. http://www.packetstormsecurity.org/papers/general/whitepaper_httpresponse.pdf


--
http://o0o.nu/~meder

Comments

RSS Feed Subscribe to this comment feed

No comments yet, be the first!

Login or Register to post a comment

Want To Donate?


Bitcoin: 18PFeCVLwpmaBuQqd5xAYZ8bZdvbyEWMmU

File Archive:

April 2018

  • Su
  • Mo
  • Tu
  • We
  • Th
  • Fr
  • Sa
  • 1
    Apr 1st
    5 Files
  • 2
    Apr 2nd
    17 Files
  • 3
    Apr 3rd
    11 Files
  • 4
    Apr 4th
    21 Files
  • 5
    Apr 5th
    17 Files
  • 6
    Apr 6th
    12 Files
  • 7
    Apr 7th
    1 Files
  • 8
    Apr 8th
    6 Files
  • 9
    Apr 9th
    21 Files
  • 10
    Apr 10th
    18 Files
  • 11
    Apr 11th
    42 Files
  • 12
    Apr 12th
    7 Files
  • 13
    Apr 13th
    14 Files
  • 14
    Apr 14th
    1 Files
  • 15
    Apr 15th
    1 Files
  • 16
    Apr 16th
    15 Files
  • 17
    Apr 17th
    20 Files
  • 18
    Apr 18th
    24 Files
  • 19
    Apr 19th
    20 Files
  • 20
    Apr 20th
    7 Files
  • 21
    Apr 21st
    10 Files
  • 22
    Apr 22nd
    0 Files
  • 23
    Apr 23rd
    0 Files
  • 24
    Apr 24th
    0 Files
  • 25
    Apr 25th
    0 Files
  • 26
    Apr 26th
    0 Files
  • 27
    Apr 27th
    0 Files
  • 28
    Apr 28th
    0 Files
  • 29
    Apr 29th
    0 Files
  • 30
    Apr 30th
    0 Files

Top Authors In Last 30 Days

File Tags

Systems

packet storm

© 2018 Packet Storm. All rights reserved.

Services
Security Services
Hosting By
Rokasec
close