what you don't know can hurt you
Home Files News &[SERVICES_TAB]About Contact Add New

Microsoft Windows Kernel win32k!NtGdiHLSurfGetInformation Memory Disclosure

Microsoft Windows Kernel win32k!NtGdiHLSurfGetInformation Memory Disclosure
Posted Sep 19, 2017
Authored by Google Security Research, mjurczyk

The Microsoft Windows kernel suffers from a stack memory disclosure vulnerability in win32k!NtGdiHLSurfGetInformation.

tags | advisory, kernel
systems | windows
advisories | CVE-2017-8677
SHA-256 | 9771af75ba5776d56facb4df49d7fb859a4bfd6477530871ca30eecee7176653

Microsoft Windows Kernel win32k!NtGdiHLSurfGetInformation Memory Disclosure

Change Mirror Download
Windows Kernel stack memory disclosure in win32k!NtGdiHLSurfGetInformation (information class 3) 

CVE-2017-8677


We have discovered that the win32k!NtGdiHLSurfGetInformation system call discloses portions of uninitialized kernel stack memory to user-mode clients.

The bug was detected on up-to-date Windows 10 32-bit, when the syscall was invoked with information class 3 corresponding to a "DwmGetSurfaceData" operation. The output buffer in this case is expected to be 0x30 bytes long, but within that memory region, 8 bytes remain uninitialized by the kernel (4 at offset 0x14 and 4 at offset 0x2c):

--- cut ---
00000000: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
00000010: 00 00 00 00 ff ff ff ff 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
00000020: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ff ff ff ff ................
--- cut ---

In the above memory layout dump, 00 denote bytes which are properly initialized, while ff indicate uninitialized values copied back to user-mode. The uninitialized bytes are allocated in the scope of the win32k!NtGdiHLSurfGetInformation function stack frame.

The full stack trace at the time of the memory disclosure is as follows:

--- cut ---
nt!memcpy
win32kfull!NtGdiHLSurfGetInformation
nt!KiSystemServicePostCall
ntdll!KiFastSystemCallRet
win32u!NtGdiHLSurfGetInformation
gdi32full!DwmGetSurfaceData
dwmcore!CRedirectedGDISurface::GetInformation
dwmcore!CGdiSpriteBitmap::UpdateSurface
dwmcore!CGdiSpriteBitmap::ProcessUpdateSurface
dwmcore!CComposition::ProcessCommandBatch
dwmcore!CComposition::ProcessDataOnChannelSameProcess
dwmcore!CComposition::ProcessPartitionCommand
dwmcore!CKernelTransport::DispatchBatches
dwmcore!CCrossThreadComposition::ProcessBatches
dwmcore!CCrossThreadComposition::PreRender
dwmcore!CComposition::ProcessComposition
dwmcore!CPartitionVerticalBlankScheduler::ProcessFrame
dwmcore!CPartitionVerticalBlankScheduler::Run
dwmcore!CPartitionThread::ThreadMain
KERNEL32!BaseThreadInitThunk
ntdll!__RtlUserThreadStart
ntdll!_RtlUserThreadStart
--- cut ---

Under normal circumstances, the bug occurs in the context of the dwm.exe process (as the syscall itself is also DWM-specific). Consequently, in order to exploit the issue, an attacker would first have to inject his payload into dwm.exe, and only then would be able to successfully invoke the affected service. It's unclear whether this requires any special privileges in the system, but regardless of whether it does or not, I'm reporting the bug for the vendor to evaluate and decide on the next steps.

This bug is subject to a 90 day disclosure deadline. After 90 days elapse or a patch has been made broadly available, the bug report will become visible to the public.



Found by: mjurczyk

Login or Register to add favorites

File Archive:

April 2024

  • Su
  • Mo
  • Tu
  • We
  • Th
  • Fr
  • Sa
  • 1
    Apr 1st
    10 Files
  • 2
    Apr 2nd
    26 Files
  • 3
    Apr 3rd
    40 Files
  • 4
    Apr 4th
    6 Files
  • 5
    Apr 5th
    26 Files
  • 6
    Apr 6th
    0 Files
  • 7
    Apr 7th
    0 Files
  • 8
    Apr 8th
    22 Files
  • 9
    Apr 9th
    14 Files
  • 10
    Apr 10th
    10 Files
  • 11
    Apr 11th
    13 Files
  • 12
    Apr 12th
    14 Files
  • 13
    Apr 13th
    0 Files
  • 14
    Apr 14th
    0 Files
  • 15
    Apr 15th
    30 Files
  • 16
    Apr 16th
    10 Files
  • 17
    Apr 17th
    22 Files
  • 18
    Apr 18th
    45 Files
  • 19
    Apr 19th
    8 Files
  • 20
    Apr 20th
    0 Files
  • 21
    Apr 21st
    0 Files
  • 22
    Apr 22nd
    11 Files
  • 23
    Apr 23rd
    68 Files
  • 24
    Apr 24th
    23 Files
  • 25
    Apr 25th
    16 Files
  • 26
    Apr 26th
    0 Files
  • 27
    Apr 27th
    0 Files
  • 28
    Apr 28th
    0 Files
  • 29
    Apr 29th
    0 Files
  • 30
    Apr 30th
    0 Files

Top Authors In Last 30 Days

File Tags

Systems

packet storm

© 2022 Packet Storm. All rights reserved.

Services
Security Services
Hosting By
Rokasec
close