ignore security and it'll go away

Microsoft Windows Kernel win32k!NtGdiHLSurfGetInformation Memory Disclosure

Microsoft Windows Kernel win32k!NtGdiHLSurfGetInformation Memory Disclosure
Posted Sep 19, 2017
Authored by Google Security Research, mjurczyk

The Microsoft Windows kernel suffers from a stack memory disclosure vulnerability in win32k!NtGdiHLSurfGetInformation.

tags | advisory, kernel
systems | windows
advisories | CVE-2017-8677
MD5 | ea7057c9591140087eed136016fbcd5a

Microsoft Windows Kernel win32k!NtGdiHLSurfGetInformation Memory Disclosure

Change Mirror Download
Windows Kernel stack memory disclosure in win32k!NtGdiHLSurfGetInformation (information class 3) 

CVE-2017-8677


We have discovered that the win32k!NtGdiHLSurfGetInformation system call discloses portions of uninitialized kernel stack memory to user-mode clients.

The bug was detected on up-to-date Windows 10 32-bit, when the syscall was invoked with information class 3 corresponding to a "DwmGetSurfaceData" operation. The output buffer in this case is expected to be 0x30 bytes long, but within that memory region, 8 bytes remain uninitialized by the kernel (4 at offset 0x14 and 4 at offset 0x2c):

--- cut ---
00000000: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
00000010: 00 00 00 00 ff ff ff ff 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
00000020: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ff ff ff ff ................
--- cut ---

In the above memory layout dump, 00 denote bytes which are properly initialized, while ff indicate uninitialized values copied back to user-mode. The uninitialized bytes are allocated in the scope of the win32k!NtGdiHLSurfGetInformation function stack frame.

The full stack trace at the time of the memory disclosure is as follows:

--- cut ---
nt!memcpy
win32kfull!NtGdiHLSurfGetInformation
nt!KiSystemServicePostCall
ntdll!KiFastSystemCallRet
win32u!NtGdiHLSurfGetInformation
gdi32full!DwmGetSurfaceData
dwmcore!CRedirectedGDISurface::GetInformation
dwmcore!CGdiSpriteBitmap::UpdateSurface
dwmcore!CGdiSpriteBitmap::ProcessUpdateSurface
dwmcore!CComposition::ProcessCommandBatch
dwmcore!CComposition::ProcessDataOnChannelSameProcess
dwmcore!CComposition::ProcessPartitionCommand
dwmcore!CKernelTransport::DispatchBatches
dwmcore!CCrossThreadComposition::ProcessBatches
dwmcore!CCrossThreadComposition::PreRender
dwmcore!CComposition::ProcessComposition
dwmcore!CPartitionVerticalBlankScheduler::ProcessFrame
dwmcore!CPartitionVerticalBlankScheduler::Run
dwmcore!CPartitionThread::ThreadMain
KERNEL32!BaseThreadInitThunk
ntdll!__RtlUserThreadStart
ntdll!_RtlUserThreadStart
--- cut ---

Under normal circumstances, the bug occurs in the context of the dwm.exe process (as the syscall itself is also DWM-specific). Consequently, in order to exploit the issue, an attacker would first have to inject his payload into dwm.exe, and only then would be able to successfully invoke the affected service. It's unclear whether this requires any special privileges in the system, but regardless of whether it does or not, I'm reporting the bug for the vendor to evaluate and decide on the next steps.

This bug is subject to a 90 day disclosure deadline. After 90 days elapse or a patch has been made broadly available, the bug report will become visible to the public.



Found by: mjurczyk

Comments

RSS Feed Subscribe to this comment feed

No comments yet, be the first!

Login or Register to post a comment

File Archive:

October 2017

  • Su
  • Mo
  • Tu
  • We
  • Th
  • Fr
  • Sa
  • 1
    Oct 1st
    15 Files
  • 2
    Oct 2nd
    16 Files
  • 3
    Oct 3rd
    15 Files
  • 4
    Oct 4th
    15 Files
  • 5
    Oct 5th
    11 Files
  • 6
    Oct 6th
    6 Files
  • 7
    Oct 7th
    2 Files
  • 8
    Oct 8th
    1 Files
  • 9
    Oct 9th
    13 Files
  • 10
    Oct 10th
    16 Files
  • 11
    Oct 11th
    15 Files
  • 12
    Oct 12th
    23 Files
  • 13
    Oct 13th
    13 Files
  • 14
    Oct 14th
    12 Files
  • 15
    Oct 15th
    2 Files
  • 16
    Oct 16th
    16 Files
  • 17
    Oct 17th
    16 Files
  • 18
    Oct 18th
    15 Files
  • 19
    Oct 19th
    10 Files
  • 20
    Oct 20th
    7 Files
  • 21
    Oct 21st
    4 Files
  • 22
    Oct 22nd
    2 Files
  • 23
    Oct 23rd
    10 Files
  • 24
    Oct 24th
    0 Files
  • 25
    Oct 25th
    0 Files
  • 26
    Oct 26th
    0 Files
  • 27
    Oct 27th
    0 Files
  • 28
    Oct 28th
    0 Files
  • 29
    Oct 29th
    0 Files
  • 30
    Oct 30th
    0 Files
  • 31
    Oct 31st
    0 Files

Top Authors In Last 30 Days

File Tags

Systems

packet storm

© 2016 Packet Storm. All rights reserved.

Services
Security Services
Hosting By
Rokasec
close